2019
DOI: 10.1080/14794802.2019.1579668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematics teachers’ ability to identify situations appropriate for proportional reasoning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As we mentioned in the introduction, the acquisition of proportional reasoning is so significant that algebra depends on it. In-service teachers must continue to study and learn, because as Weiland et al [55]'s results show, the issues found in students and pre-service teachers also seem to be prevalent with in-service teachers. More research will be needed to explore teachers' requirements and how their acquisition of proportional reasoning could be improved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we mentioned in the introduction, the acquisition of proportional reasoning is so significant that algebra depends on it. In-service teachers must continue to study and learn, because as Weiland et al [55]'s results show, the issues found in students and pre-service teachers also seem to be prevalent with in-service teachers. More research will be needed to explore teachers' requirements and how their acquisition of proportional reasoning could be improved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Garis masa ini dipilih memandangkan bilangan kajian yang diterbitkan adalah mencukupi untuk menjalankan semakan perwakilan. Kaiser et al, 2019;Refugio et al, 2020;Yang et al, 2018Yang et al, , 2021Trung Tran et al, 2020;Huda & Pardimin, 2018;Kuzu & Arican, 2020;Maire et al, 2021, Weiland et al, 2019Stephen Norton, 2019;Matiash et al, 2020;Christiansen & Erixon, 2021;Blomeke et al, 2020;Caroline et al, 2019;Davrajoo & Letchumanan, 2019;Schiepe-Tiska, 2019;Retnawati et al, 2018;Jehana M. Darkis, 2020;Baier et al 2019;Kusumawati et al, 2020). Selain itu, terdapat 16 kajian melibatkan analisis kualitatif (Chen et al, 2021;Alsina & Mula, 2019;Choy & Dindyal, 2018;Gómez-Blancarte et al, 2019;Larrain & Kaiser, 2019;Tupas, 2019;Mesut Ozturk, 2021;Beswick & Fraser, 2019;Ramos Rodriques et al, 2021;Depaepe et al, 2020;Marufi et al, 2020;Kim How et al, 2021;Grace et al, 2020;Sadykova et al, 2021;Jita et al, 2019), dan selebihnya terdapat 2 yang melibatkan kaedah campuran (Mamsi & Herbert, 2020;Aguirre et al, 2021) bagi memastikan ianya munasabah, tepat dan berguna.…”
Section: Saringanunclassified
“…A pesar de su importancia, numerosas investigaciones revelan que tanto profesores en formación como en ejercicio presentan dificultades para comprender y enseñar algunos de los componentes que constituyen el razonamiento proporcional (Ben-Chaim et al, 2012;Buforn et al, 2018;Burgos y Godino, 2022a;Izsák y Jacobson, 2017;Hilton y Hilton, 2019;Nagar et al, 2016;Weiland et al, 2019), así como para interpretar el pensamiento matemático de los alumnos cuando resuelven problemas de proporcionalidad (Buforn et al, 2020;Burgos y Godino, 2022B;Fernández et al, 2012Fernández et al, , 2013.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified