2020
DOI: 10.3934/math.2020209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical morphology approach to internal defect analysis of A356 aluminum alloy wheel hubs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, researchers have done some work, such as Li [1], in order to improve the accuracy of automobile wheel hub defect image detection and recognition, an improved peak algorithm-the trend peak algorithm-was proposed to extract the wheel hub defect area and combined with the BP neural network to recognize the wheel hub defects. Zhang [2] aimed at the internal defects such as air hole and shrinkage cavity in the process of low-pressure casting of the wheel hub, a method of defect extraction based on mathematical morphology was employed, all of which belongs to the traditional recognition method's artificial design feature, so in the face of complex samples, the robustness is poor. While deep learning technology has advantages: automatic feature extraction, weight sharing, and needless image preprocessing.…”
Section: Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, researchers have done some work, such as Li [1], in order to improve the accuracy of automobile wheel hub defect image detection and recognition, an improved peak algorithm-the trend peak algorithm-was proposed to extract the wheel hub defect area and combined with the BP neural network to recognize the wheel hub defects. Zhang [2] aimed at the internal defects such as air hole and shrinkage cavity in the process of low-pressure casting of the wheel hub, a method of defect extraction based on mathematical morphology was employed, all of which belongs to the traditional recognition method's artificial design feature, so in the face of complex samples, the robustness is poor. While deep learning technology has advantages: automatic feature extraction, weight sharing, and needless image preprocessing.…”
Section: Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to illustrate the structural matching between the semantic space and the feature space, we tried to minimize the pairing relationships between classes in these two spaces. Therefore, we constructed relational matrices D a for semantic descriptors and image features, and each of these elements was derived from 2 2 , where a u and a v represent semantic descriptors of seen class defects u and v respectively. The image feature relationship matrix D ϕ was built, and each element was calculated by the formula…”
Section: Structure Matching Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The automated inspection of tire rims is generally performed using X-ray analysis or conventional image processing [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. In the current study, we constructed an automated system to detect defects on the forged aluminum rims of electric vehicles, using deep learning and convolutional neural networks [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%