1992
DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780110512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical models of complex dose‐response relationships: Implications for experimental design in psychopharmacologic research

Abstract: We develop a mathematical model to account for the complex relationship between drug dose and clinical response in psychopharmacologic research. The model specifies relationships among drug dose, drug bioavailability, pharmacokinetic factors, course moderators, clinical response and the heterogeneity of the disorder, and allows for the derivation of results that have implications for experimental design in psychopharmacologic research. These results form the basis for computer simulations which indicate that r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Longer follow-up studies should be conducted to answer this question. Also, because we did not manipulate treatment as an independent variable, we cannot use our study to determine treatment effectiveness (Faraone et al, 1992) nor to describe the untreated course of ADHD. For some variables the data were quite sparse and comparisons were underpowered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longer follow-up studies should be conducted to answer this question. Also, because we did not manipulate treatment as an independent variable, we cannot use our study to determine treatment effectiveness (Faraone et al, 1992) nor to describe the untreated course of ADHD. For some variables the data were quite sparse and comparisons were underpowered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 In all studies in which treated and untreated youths with ADHD had a similar severity at baseline, examination of individual studies 14,21,22,24 -26 reveals a reduction in the risk for SUD (Table 2). In contrast, in the 1 study in which SUD was associated with earlier stimulant exposure, severity at baseline was asymmetrically represented in the treated group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 This paradox occurs because of 2 naturalistic correlations: 1) for many psychiatric disorders, people with more severe disorders are usually given more intense treatments (ie, higher doses or longer duration of treatment); and 2) for many disorders, increasing severity predicts worse outcome. Thus, we assessed studies for evidence of baseline severity differences between the treated and untreated ADHD groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not manipulate treatment as an independent variable, and cannot use our study to determine treatment effectiveness (Faraone, Simpson, & Brown, 1992) nor to describe the untreated course of ADHD. A second independent reporter was not available for all participants assessed which could have led to an underestimate of ADHD persistence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%