2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2007.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical modelling of influence functions in computer-controlled polishing: Part I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that Eq. [8] Downloaded by [New York University] at 23:52 15 July 2015 has the same form as Eq. [1] proposed in Shorey, et al (5).…”
Section: Materials Removal Ratementioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note that Eq. [8] Downloaded by [New York University] at 23:52 15 July 2015 has the same form as Eq. [1] proposed in Shorey, et al (5).…”
Section: Materials Removal Ratementioning
confidence: 87%
“…[6] and [7], obtained from the modeling and experimental efforts, into Eq. [8] gives the MRR in the MR finishing in the form…”
Section: Materials Removal Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the magnetic field, the fluid adheres the periphery of the wheel. The shape of the fluid is determined by wheel speed, the magnetic field strength, gap between the workpice and wheel, and fluid flow rate (Schinhaerl, Smith et al 2008). Researchers have tried different variants in wheel type MRF both include using permanent magnets and electromagnets.…”
Section: Magnetorheological Finishing(mrf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer-controlled polishing machines and mathematical models to analyze material removal characteristics have been developed for polishing spherical, aspheric and free form surfaces, where small-size tools are employed [3][4][5][6] . We presented our efforts in developing a polishing process using a large size polishing lap, where a mathematical model was developed to estimate the residual surface errors under a given set of operating parameter and lap configurations 7,8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%