2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10763-015-9707-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching the Function Concept and Student Learning Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These bases for mathematical proficiency have been variously described as the practices that students engage with and demonstrate that they can do as they learn and use the mathematical content (ACARA, 2016; National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM], 2014). With context related factors (e.g., the school, home, wider education system) in the lesson implementation in mind (Kilpatrick et al, 2001), the nature of classroom mathematics teaching impacts the development of mathematical proficiency in students (Hatisaru, 2017;Hiebert & Grouws, 2007;NCTM, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These bases for mathematical proficiency have been variously described as the practices that students engage with and demonstrate that they can do as they learn and use the mathematical content (ACARA, 2016; National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM], 2014). With context related factors (e.g., the school, home, wider education system) in the lesson implementation in mind (Kilpatrick et al, 2001), the nature of classroom mathematics teaching impacts the development of mathematical proficiency in students (Hatisaru, 2017;Hiebert & Grouws, 2007;NCTM, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rulebased definition was a category stated by Vinner and Dreyfus (1989) and Viirman et al (2010). Being one of the most observed definitions in both the literature and textbooks (Akkoç & Tall, 2005;Hatisaru & Erbas, 2017;Vinner & Dreyfus, 1989), using Drichlet-Bourbaki definition more than other definitions was a usual finding. As Viirman et al (2010) stated, the structural Bourbaki definition was used in upper-secondary schools (Akkoç & Tall, 2005;Hatisaru & Erbas, 2017), but in their study, Viirman et al (2010) found most of their sample (student teachers and engineering students) used rule-based definition as defined in their textbooks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Por otro lado, estudios sobre el conocimiento de los profesores sobre la función (Even, 1993;Hatisaru & Erbas, 2015;Wilson, 1994) informan que la mayoría de los profesores desconocen aspectos conceptuales sobre ella, aprueban definiciones informales y las perciben como definiciones matemáticamente formales, identifican ejemplos estándar de funciones, y manifiestan dificultades para identificar fenómenos físicos que se modelan con relaciones funcionales. Del mismo modo, la naturaleza arbitraria de las funciones está ausente, y muy pocos estudiantes pueden explicar la importancia y origen del requerimiento de la univalencia.…”
Section: Magisunclassified