2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2012.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal occupation and the risk of major birth defects: A follow-up analysis from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study

Abstract: This study further examined the association between selected maternal occupations and a variety of birth defects identified from prior analysis and explored the effect of work hours and number of jobs held and potential interaction between folic acid and occupation. Data from a population-based, multi-center case-control study was used. Analyses included 45 major defects and specific sub-occupations under five occupational groups: healthcare workers, cleaners, scientists, teachers and personal service workers.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Parental occupational exposures were not extensively studied in relation to ARM (Supporting Information Table S3). However, mothers prenatally exposed to industrial cleaning agents and solvents while working as cleaners or janitors seemed to have an increased risk of giving birth to a child with ARM (Herdt-Losavio et al, 2010;van Rooij et al, 2010;Wijers et al, 2010;Lin et al, 2012a). In one study, the risk was also elevated for mothers employed as scientists during pregnancy (Herdt-Losavio et al, 2010).…”
Section: Occupational and Lifestyle Factorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Parental occupational exposures were not extensively studied in relation to ARM (Supporting Information Table S3). However, mothers prenatally exposed to industrial cleaning agents and solvents while working as cleaners or janitors seemed to have an increased risk of giving birth to a child with ARM (Herdt-Losavio et al, 2010;van Rooij et al, 2010;Wijers et al, 2010;Lin et al, 2012a). In one study, the risk was also elevated for mothers employed as scientists during pregnancy (Herdt-Losavio et al, 2010).…”
Section: Occupational and Lifestyle Factorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although only 2–8% of patients with ARM have an affected first‐ or second‐degree relative (Spouge and Baird, ; Stoll et al, ; Forrester and Merz, ; Falcone et al, ; van Rooij et al, ; Wijers et al, ), ARM co‐occurs more often among family members than would be expected by chance (Lie et al, ; Oyen et al, ; van Rooij et al, ; Wijers et al, ). Familial occurrence seems to be most frequent when a perineal or vestibular fistula is present (Falcone et al, ).…”
Section: Genetic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common risk factors reported were maternal exposure to tobacco products [81,82], alcohols [83], some viral infections [70], pesticides [84], and teratogens in the workplace or at home in early pregnancy [85][86][87]. Recognized teratogens included rare exposures such as phenytoin, valproic acid, thalidomide, and herbicides such as dioxin.…”
Section: Maternal Exogenous Exposuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NTDs are the second most common of birth defects, which are preventable and are significant causes of infant death and childhood disability [1,2]. It is estimated that there are more than 300,000 NTDs worldwide each year, many of these occurring in low-resource countries [3]. Anencephaly and spina bifida are the most common NTDs and occur with about equal frequency, whereas encephalocele is seen less frequently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%