2015
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal–fetal conflict, genomic imprinting and mammalian vulnerabilities to cancer

Abstract: Antagonistic coevolution between maternal and fetal genes, and between maternally and paternally derived genes may have increased mammalian vulnerability to cancer. Placental trophoblast has evolved to invade maternal tissues and evade structural and immunological constraints on its invasion. These adaptations can be co-opted by cancer in intrasomatic selection. Imprinted genes of maternal and paternal origin favour different degrees of proliferation of particular cell types in which they reside. As a result, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
1
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Above all, this alteration in TP53 allele-specific expression ratios suggests that TP53 may be subject to genomic imprinting [35] in this LFS family. Although a role for genomic imprinting of TP53 in human oncogenesis has not yet been established, it has been implicated in mice [36], as well as for other tumor suppressors in humans [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Above all, this alteration in TP53 allele-specific expression ratios suggests that TP53 may be subject to genomic imprinting [35] in this LFS family. Although a role for genomic imprinting of TP53 in human oncogenesis has not yet been established, it has been implicated in mice [36], as well as for other tumor suppressors in humans [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haig [43], working in the same vein as Boddy et al [42], argues that intra-genomic conflict has led to genes with carcinogenic functions, which may explain why animals, and particularly mammals, seem to be more cancer-prone than other forms of multicellularity [2,44]. Genes for placental development have evolved to invade maternal tissues and evade the maternal immune system.…”
Section: The Objectives Of This Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since transmissible cancer cell lines evolve on the evolutionary landscape of the host genomes, a sufficiently high prevalence of a transmissible cancer can result in a tug‐of‐war akin to host–parasite interactions between the selfish malignant cell lines and host genomes (sensu ‘Red‐Queen’ dynamics) . A recent study by Decker et al demonstrated such host adaptation to CTVT cells where potential resistance conferring mutations were observed in the dog genome in self‐antigen presentation (MHC), immune surveillance, genome integrity maintenance and cell apoptosis regulation pathways.…”
Section: Transmissible Cancer Invokes Adaptive Changes and Responses mentioning
confidence: 99%