2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal breastfeeding, parafunctional oral habits and malocclusion in adolescents: A multivariate analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
52
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(35 reference statements)
1
52
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…and Thomaz et al . 30, 31 examined the association between breastfeeding and dental/skeletal class II in mixed dentition and Nahas-Scocate et al ., Caramez da Silva et al ., Feldens et al . and Agarwal et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and Thomaz et al . 30, 31 examined the association between breastfeeding and dental/skeletal class II in mixed dentition and Nahas-Scocate et al ., Caramez da Silva et al ., Feldens et al . and Agarwal et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 (2014) Cross-sectional714 (-) 52.38% M (374) 47.62% F (340) 6–11 years Consecutive BrazilPosterior crossbite greater in children not breastfed, p = 0.001Exposure: not breastfed, Event: posterior crossbite, OR 2.25 (1.52–3.33), p < 0.001 Exposure: breastfed for less than 6 months, Event: posterior crossbite, OR 1.76 (1.09–2.84)6Thomaz et al . 31 (2012) Cross-sectional2026 (0) 44.1% M (892) 55.9% F (1168) 12–15 years Probabilistic stratified two-stage clusters BrazilBreastfeeding for up to 6 months associated with Class II and Class III associated with bruxism. Short breastfeeding period associated with severely convex profile, less concave profile associated with oral breathing p < 0.05Exposure: Breastfeeding for up to 6 months with history of nocturnal bruxism, Event: Class II, OR 3.14 (1.28–7.66) p = 0.01 Exposure: Breastfeeding for up to 6 months with history of bruxism, Event: Class III, OR 2.78 (1.21–6.36) p = 0.015Sanchez Molins et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,12,17 Using multilevel analysis was due to the importance of investigating interactions between variables on different levels (individual and contextual), which showed greater statistical effi ciency, more power and less bias than the one contained in a multivariate analysis as the logistic regression. 7 The study highlighted the infl uence of variables related to the socioeconomic context on the severity of malocclusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Some authors have emphasized that the most vulnerable households are more susceptible to malocclusion. 17 Specifi cally in relation to malocclusion, Tomita et al 18 (2000) developed a theoretical model that posits the infl uence of socioeconomic factors on malocclusion through oral habits psychological factors and general patterns of disease. Conceptual models allow us to clarify that socioeconomic factors and access-toservice factors can infl uence exposure to and development of oral health problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These non-nutritive sucking habits are often not limited to the vertical plane, but may also affect the transverse dimension manifesting as posterior cross-bites [20]. More recently, Thomaz and colleagues used anthropometric points to describe facial morphology, and found a high prevalence of severe facial convexity in adolescents who had been breastfed for relatively short periods and exhibited prolonged mouth-breathing habits that persisted until after the age of 6 years [21].…”
Section: Mini Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%