1990
DOI: 10.1016/0022-4596(90)90059-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Materials with layered structures. III. The system CoGa2S4CoIn2S4 and the crystal structure of CoGaInS4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many layered Fe‐T sulfides have been synthesized in experiments. While FeGa 2 S 4 and NiGa 2 S 4 are isomorphic with 1:2:4 stoichiometry, for M = V/Cr, noninteger stoichiometric V 0.97 Ga 1.93 S 4 and Cr 0.9 Ga 2 S 4 are reported in Fe‐T structure, and for M = Mn/Co, their quaternary chalcogenides, such as MnGa x Ti 2− x S 4 , CoGa x In 2− x S 4 , and CoGa 2 S x Se 4− x , all exhibit Fe‐T phase under certain x ranges. Some other layered MGa 2 X 4 may exhibit Zn‐T phase, such as ZnIn 2 S 4 and CdIn 2 S 4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many layered Fe‐T sulfides have been synthesized in experiments. While FeGa 2 S 4 and NiGa 2 S 4 are isomorphic with 1:2:4 stoichiometry, for M = V/Cr, noninteger stoichiometric V 0.97 Ga 1.93 S 4 and Cr 0.9 Ga 2 S 4 are reported in Fe‐T structure, and for M = Mn/Co, their quaternary chalcogenides, such as MnGa x Ti 2− x S 4 , CoGa x In 2− x S 4 , and CoGa 2 S x Se 4− x , all exhibit Fe‐T phase under certain x ranges. Some other layered MGa 2 X 4 may exhibit Zn‐T phase, such as ZnIn 2 S 4 and CdIn 2 S 4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The starting values for the atomic positions were taken from CoGaInS4 (Haeuseler, Stork and Cordes, 1990). The least squares refinement of the fractional coordinates, the anisotropic thermal parameters, the site occupation factors, and secondary extinction (2.14(4)E-5) Brought to you by | New York University Bobst Library Technical Service Authenticated Download Date | 6/24/15 9:13 PM Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P3m1 Early structure approaches P3m1; later study reports a doubled c axis 7R3m 4.8 LiYMo 3 O 8 de Benedittis & Katz (1965), McCarroll (1977 28525 S35 0.03 < $ Á < $ 0.30 Undetermined P6m2 Assuming O1 is in Wyckoff position 1(c) instead of 1(a), space group likely to be misassigned (8) LiScMo 3 O 8 28526 LiInMo 3 O 8 30579 4.9 -CuI Kurdyumova & 30363 S36(a) ED study gave incorrect unit cell; Baranova (1961) Sakuma (1988) Keen & Hull (1994 84217 S36(b) 0.061 < $ Á < $ 0.92 0.23 < $ u iso < $ 0.44 P6m2 XRD study approaches P6m2; 78429 S36(c) 80230 S36 (d) ND study places -phase in P3m1, with Cu disordered (9) 4.10 BaVO 2.5 de Beaulieu & Mü ller-Buschbaum (1982) 32657 S37 0.02 < $ Á < $ 0.16 0.01 < $ u iso < $ 0.26 P6m2 Space group most likely misassigned; further study advisable (10) 4.11 Na(Cu 0.67 Fe 0.22 -Zn 0.11 ) 2 S 2 Kaplunnik et al (1990) 39255 S38 Á < $ 0.01 0.06 < $ u eq < $ 0.14 P3m1 Space group most likely to be misassigned (11) 4.12 T 0 -Cr 0.68 Se Wehmeier et al (1970) 42703 S39 All Á = 0 Undetermined P3m1 Space group is most likely to be misassigned (12) 4.13 Fe 10 O 14 (OH) 2 Eggleton & Fitzpatrick (1988) 56287 S40 0.12 < $ Á 0.31 Undetermined P3m1 Initial space group most likely misassigned; pair distribution function of total X-ray scattering gives improved fit in P6 3 mc (13) Michel et al (2007) unlisted centrosymmetric 0.08 < $ u iso < $ 10 P6 3 mc 4.14 CoGaInS 4 Depero et al (1991) Haeuseler et al (1990 86413 S41(a) 0.01 < $ Á < $ 0.02 0.13 < $ u iso < $ 0.14 P3m1 The highly likely space-group misassignment is confirmed on origin translation (14) 86414 S41(b) 69015 S41(c) P3m1 Centrosymmetry determined 4.15 LaNdO 1.75 S Kuz'micheva et al…”
Section: Undeterminedmentioning
confidence: 99%