2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-55908-2_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Materials Issues and Characterization of Low-k Dielectric Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies on various low relative permittivity materials have demonstrated that most of structural, optical, mechanical, electrical, dielectric, and thermal properties of polymer films are expected to be film thickness dependent [l-71. Hence, the film thickness dependence of the key properties of dielectric films becomes an important IC issue [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies on various low relative permittivity materials have demonstrated that most of structural, optical, mechanical, electrical, dielectric, and thermal properties of polymer films are expected to be film thickness dependent [l-71. Hence, the film thickness dependence of the key properties of dielectric films becomes an important IC issue [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pore and cage sizes were extracted in [8] using the model proposed in [1,2], which is also used to calculate the temperature evolution of the lifetimes of o-Ps trapped in the pores and cages. Changes in the lifetime components due to changes in pore size is unlikely, since the thermal expansion coefficient at room temperature for similar materials (HSSQ) is 20.5 ppm per K [9] or <1% from 300 K to 50 K, amounting to <100 ps change in lifetime. For porosities below 10.4%, the mean lifetime decreases slightly with decreasing temperature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence RC delay can be reduced, other additional benefits include less power consumption and reduced joule heating. The lower resistivity of Cu implies a thinner metal could be used for a fixed resistance per unit length, which reduces sidewall capacitance responsible for crosstalk as the thickness of the adjacent dielectric material is also reduced (since crosstalk is proportional to sidewall capacitance and total capacitance ratio [13])…”
Section: School Ofmechanical and Aerospace Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to its electrical property benefits, Cu is also mechanically reliable owning to its higher stiffness (130 GPa vs 70 GPa) [13][14][15] and is a better heat conductor as…”
Section: School Ofmechanical and Aerospace Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation