Materially Informed Design to Robotic Production: A Robotic 3D Printing System for Informed Material Deposition

Mostafavi, Sina; Bier, Henriette

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26378-6_27

Cited by 18 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The clay layering created a varying horizontal texture that couldn't be predicted or identically replicated in other modules (Friedman et al, 2014;Mostafavi & Bier, 2016). This confirmed Schön's contention that the design process is not one in which the 'mental image' of the designer is simply given in physical form.…”

Section: Manufacturing Methods 1: Generating Conical Modules Through Amentioning

confidence: 82%

“…The advantage of layered extrusion is the ability to develop tapering form. As was shown in recent experimental research (Friedman et al, 2014;Mostafavi & Bier, 2016) this type of extrusion follows the geometric complexities of a digital model whilst also enabling the clay material to express its behaviour. Layered extrusion was studied in this paper to understand how conical form could be created in clay.…”

Section: Materials Feedback From Manufacturing Methods 1 Andmentioning

confidence: 86%

“…Over the last decade researchers have focused on exploring the potential of additive clay deposition in manufacturing large structures ("ELstudio," 2016;"Fab Clay," 2012;Friedman, Kim, & Mesa, 2014;Mostafavi & Bier, 2016). Their research aimed to develop a system in which the observed behaviour of clay was integrated as part of the digital design process to create components for screened vertical or arched structures.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Similar to Fry's craft worker both manufacturing methods were carried out in an intuitive way. The machines involved were used in manual mode to allow an investigation of the clay behavior, probing its capabilities and limits of workability (Ganiatsas, 2013;Mostafavi & Bier, 2016), leading to discoveries that guided the decisions in creating the artificial reef.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This process demonstrated that material reactions within a specific environment are unpredictable (Mostafavi & Bier, 2016). The clay layering created a varying horizontal texture that couldn't be predicted or identically replicated in other modules (Friedman et al, 2014;Mostafavi & Bier, 2016).…”

Section: Manufacturing Methods 1: Generating Conical Modules Through Amentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Architecture for Regenerating Living Ecosystems: Designing a clay module for a vaulted dome structure

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:Coral reefs are rapidly vanishing in the Great Barrier Reef. Design may play a part in coral reef preservation. This paper describes the design process for developing a clay artificial reef inspired by the geometries of the Oulophyllia bennettae. The design aims to: 1. provide a structure for the rapid regrowth of a coral reef ecosystem, and, 2. demonstrate how the material clay can guide the development of form. The design process follows a material-centric approach. The paper outlines two manufacturing methods that transfer the digitally generated artificial reef models to the material realm as clay module prototypes. One process uses a robotic arm with a clay-filled syringe, while another process uses a traditional clay extruder. The results describe how the clay reacted to each method and how the design for the artificial reef evolved in response to these observations to develop functional form for an underwater environment.

show abstract

Section: Manufacturing Methods 1: Generating Conical Modules Through Amentioning

confidence: 82%

Section: Materials Feedback From Manufacturing Methods 1 Andmentioning

confidence: 86%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Manufacturing Methods 1: Generating Conical Modules Through Amentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Architecture for Regenerating Living Ecosystems: Designing a clay module for a vaulted dome structure

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Visions of Process—Swarm Intelligence and Swarm Robotics in Architectural Design and Construction

Vehlken

2018

Springer Series in Adaptive Environments

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Robotic Building implies both physically built robotic environments and robotically supported building processes. Physically built robotic environments consist of reconfigurable, adaptive systems incorporating sensor-actuator mechanisms that enable buildings to interact with their users and surroundings in real-time. These robotic environments require Design-to-Production and-Operation (D2P&O) chains that may be (partially or completely) robotically driven. This chapter describes previous work aiming to integrate D2RP&O processes by linking performance-driven design with robotic production and user-driven building operation. 5.1 Introduction While architecture and architectural production are increasingly incorporating aspects of non-human agency employing data, information, and knowledge contained within the (worldwide) network connecting electronic devices, the question is not whether but how robotic systems can be incorporated into building processes and buildings (Oosterhuis and Bier 2013). This chapter aims to answer this question by reflecting on the achievements of the Robotic Building (RB) team at Technical University Delft (TU Delft) and by identifying future steps. The focus is on an architecture that is robotically enabled to interact with its users and surroundings in real-time and the corresponding Design-to-Production and-Operation (D2P&O) processes that are (in part or as whole) robotically driven. Such modes of production and operation involve agency of both humans and non-humans. Thus agency is not The original version of the book was revised: Open access text has been updated in FM, Chapter

show abstract

Multimode Robotic Materialization

Mostafavi

Kemper

Fischer

2018

Robotic Fabrication in Architecture, Art and Design 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Materially Informed Design to Robotic Production: A Robotic 3D Printing System for Informed Material Deposition

Cited by 18 publications

References 6 publications

Architecture for Regenerating Living Ecosystems: Designing a clay module for a vaulted dome structure

Architecture for Regenerating Living Ecosystems: Designing a clay module for a vaulted dome structure

Visions of Process—Swarm Intelligence and Swarm Robotics in Architectural Design and Construction

Multimode Robotic Materialization

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About