2013
DOI: 10.1086/673129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mate Selection in Cyberspace: The Intersection of Race, Gender, and Education

Abstract: In this article, the authors examine how race, gender, and education jointly shape interaction among heterosexual Internet daters. They find that racial homophily dominates mate-searching behavior for both men and women. A racial hierarchy emerges in the reciprocating process. Women respond only to men of similar or more dominant racial status, while nonblack men respond to all but black women. Significantly, the authors find that education does not mediate the observed racial preferences among white men and w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
123
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(15 reference statements)
10
123
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, filtering went beyond appearance into other identity factors, such as perceived education level and indicators of socio-economic status. Unlike traditional dating websites that often ask for height, weight, race, or education level (Hancock et al, 2007;Lin & Lundquist, 2013;Skopek et al, 2011), there are often no other indicators beyond a few photographs and a few words of text. This allows a different perspective on Tinder: Impression management is focused on that brief moment where one decides whether to swipe right or left.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, filtering went beyond appearance into other identity factors, such as perceived education level and indicators of socio-economic status. Unlike traditional dating websites that often ask for height, weight, race, or education level (Hancock et al, 2007;Lin & Lundquist, 2013;Skopek et al, 2011), there are often no other indicators beyond a few photographs and a few words of text. This allows a different perspective on Tinder: Impression management is focused on that brief moment where one decides whether to swipe right or left.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Best and Delmege find that in an online dating environment that offers a 'plethora of choice … filtering strategies are adopted spontaneously and refined conscientiously by participants ' (2012, p. 253). This process is often more complex on dating websites, in which users are allowed to additionally screen potential matches on height and weight (Hancock, Toma, & Ellison, 2007), race (Lin & Lundquist, 2013), and education level (Skopek, Schulz, & Blossfeld, 2011).…”
Section: Minimal Filtering Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“……visit online dating sites more often [66]. No gender differences in time spent on website [43]. [66].…”
Section: Females Malesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such exchanges are manifestations of extrarelationship hierarchies, in that what provides one with status outside the relationship is also assumed to provide them with status within the relationship. 4 A similar paucity of racial heterogamy is echoed in studies on dating, although slightly less rare among cohabiting and non-residing couples (Joyner and Kao 2005;Lin and Lundquist 2013).…”
Section: Assortative Coupling and Relationship Exchangementioning
confidence: 87%