2002
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2001.1982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mate choice copying in the sailfin molly, Poecilia latipinna, in the wild

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
118
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(59 reference statements)
3
118
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pitcher and Magurran (1986); Witte and Ryan (2002); Hamilton and Dill (2003) asserted that social environment consistently creates impact toward individual performance due to the interaction with other people. Besides, social environment can also create indirectly or passively toward actual physical changes (Geva and Bloch, 2005).…”
Section: Social Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pitcher and Magurran (1986); Witte and Ryan (2002); Hamilton and Dill (2003) asserted that social environment consistently creates impact toward individual performance due to the interaction with other people. Besides, social environment can also create indirectly or passively toward actual physical changes (Geva and Bloch, 2005).…”
Section: Social Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) Mate-choice copying in non-human species: a brief review Mate-choice copying has been observed among females in a number of different non-human species [3][4][5][6], including fish [7][8][9][10] and bird species [11][12][13]. Such studies have generally shown that when females observe another female (the model) to be paired with one of two males (the targets), they are subsequently more likely to prefer the target male they had seen paired with the model over the male that was not paired with the model.…”
Section: Social Learning and Mate Preferences In Non-human Species Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other mating systems, however, benefits to males may lead to copying. For example, male sailfin mollies copy the apparent preferences of other males [10,15]. In this species, copying may be advantageous because of a short period of sexual receptivity in females, leading to a need for males to efficiently identify females who are receptive [10,15].…”
Section: Social Learning and Mate Preferences In Non-human Species Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In non-human animal species, mate choice copying has been observed among females of various species (Brown & Fawcett 2005;Dugatkin 2000;Galef & Laland 2005;White 2004). Most commonly studied are fish (Dugatkin & Godin 1992;Dugatkin & Godin 1993;Godin et al 2005;Witte & Ryan 2002) and bird species (Galef & White 1998;Swaddle et al 2005;White & Galef 2000). Mate choice copying has also been observed in males (Schlupp & Ryan 1997;Witte & Ryan 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%