2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matching supply and demand on ride-sharing platforms with permanent agents and competition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing research has taken competition as the research background and quantitatively considered platform decision-making in a competitive environment. For example, Zhong et al (2019) determined the subsidy level of temporary providers and/or the employment level of permanent providers in monopolistic and duopoly competitive environments and analyzed the impact of the employment level of permanent providers and platform competition on the platform's subsidy strategies and profitability, participant surplus and social welfare. Zhong et al (2021) studied how on-demand ride-hailing platforms that compete with the traditional taxi industry design their pricing strategies under irregular and regulated pricing scenarios and focused on government regulatory strategies to develop the transportation industry.…”
Section: Multiple Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Existing research has taken competition as the research background and quantitatively considered platform decision-making in a competitive environment. For example, Zhong et al (2019) determined the subsidy level of temporary providers and/or the employment level of permanent providers in monopolistic and duopoly competitive environments and analyzed the impact of the employment level of permanent providers and platform competition on the platform's subsidy strategies and profitability, participant surplus and social welfare. Zhong et al (2021) studied how on-demand ride-hailing platforms that compete with the traditional taxi industry design their pricing strategies under irregular and regulated pricing scenarios and focused on government regulatory strategies to develop the transportation industry.…”
Section: Multiple Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PricewaterhouseCoopers predicted that service platforms would generate over US$330 billion in revenues worldwide by 2025(Federal Trade Commission, 2016. Notably, in the last decade, the on-demand economy has experienced rapid growth and accumulated a large consumer base (Zhong et al, 2019). The on-demand economy is supported by online platforms that match consumers' demands with service offerings upon receiving the order of consumers (Taylor, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent literature has paid increasing attention to shared platforms. Zhong et al (2019) shared platforms that recruit permanent or temporary agents to provide car services for passengers. They find that the subsidy level of temporary agents or the employment of permanent agents is determined to balance agent supply and rider demand to maximize platform profit.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even when dynamic pricing is limited, our research can be a reference for a platform's static pricing decisions, for example, in regard to the range of static prices based on different regions' market demand. Some of the ride-hailing platform's social responsibilities are to reduce traffic congestion, make travel better, and help users improve the travel efficiency (e.g., Didi Chuxing and Meituan; Zhong et al [59]). From this perspective, the platform can change service quality or improve its fixed commission rate to achieve the purpose of improving traffic conditions when market demand is increasing.…”
Section: Managerial Insightsmentioning
confidence: 99%