2007
DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/01/013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matching matrix elements and shower evolution for top-pair production in hadronic collisions

Abstract: We study the matching of multijet matrix elements and shower evolution in the case of top production in hadronic collisions at the Tevatron and at the LHC. We present the results of the matching algorithm implemented in the ALPGEN Monte Carlo generator, and compare them with results obtained at the parton level, and with the predictions of the MC@NLO approach. We highlight the consistency of the matching algorithm when applied to these final states, and the excellent agreement obtained with MC@NLO for most inc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
605
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 633 publications
(609 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(21 reference statements)
3
605
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All of the parton level signal and the background events are showered using Pythia6.4 [67]. The MLM matching scheme [68] is used to avoid double counting. Detector effects are mimicked with PGS4 [69].…”
Section: Hh Channelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the parton level signal and the background events are showered using Pythia6.4 [67]. The MLM matching scheme [68] is used to avoid double counting. Detector effects are mimicked with PGS4 [69].…”
Section: Hh Channelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MC@NLO+HERWIG predictions underestimate the cross-section for six jets in the tt final state. The underestimate of the higher jet multiplicity bins for MC@NLO compared to ALPGEN is also observed in [13], where the difference is explained by a significantly smaller contribution of the tt + q(g) hard matrix-element calculation to the multijet finalstates and a higher fraction of additional jets from the parton shower [13].In contrast to MC@NLO, the prediction from POWHEG+PYTHIA is in reasonable agreement with the data for all jet p T thresholds and jet multiplicities. POWHEG(h damp ) +PYTHIA provides the best description of the leading-jet p T and the higher jet multiplicities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The MC@NLO+HERWIG predictions underestimate the cross-section for six jets in the tt final state. The underestimate of the higher jet multiplicity bins for MC@NLO compared to ALPGEN is also observed in [13], where the difference is explained by a significantly smaller contribution of the tt + q(g) hard matrix-element calculation to the multijet finalstates and a higher fraction of additional jets from the parton shower [13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To run Alpgen we use 4.0 as the maximum pseudorapidity and 0.6 as the minimum jet separation. See [18] for a comparison of Alpgen and MC@NLO and for a description of the MLM matching procedure used by Alpgen.…”
Section: Jhep03(2007)063mentioning
confidence: 99%