1994
DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(94)90344-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Masticatory performance, muscle activity, and occlusal force in preorthognathic surgery patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
51
0
14

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
51
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the muscle efficiency and force generated during mastication could not be considered the primary determinants of masticatory performance in the studied sample, agreeing with others. 19,26 The lack of correlation between masticatory variables in this study could also be attributed to the dietary habits of today. The increasing softness of food is an environmental factor that might exert a strong influence on occlusal force.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the muscle efficiency and force generated during mastication could not be considered the primary determinants of masticatory performance in the studied sample, agreeing with others. 19,26 The lack of correlation between masticatory variables in this study could also be attributed to the dietary habits of today. The increasing softness of food is an environmental factor that might exert a strong influence on occlusal force.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…On the other hand, the number of posterior functional teeth has been considered one of the best predictors of masticatory performance 9,26 because the contacts between occluding teeth determine the area available for shearing and grinding food during the chewing cycle. 5,9,11 This could explain the present findings, as children had no missing teeth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several previous studies have reported bite force as a clinical indicator of masticatory performance. This parameter is correlated with craniofacial morphology (Tsunori et al), gender (Tate et al, 1994) age (Klitgaard et al, 1990) temporomandibular disorders (TMD) (Pizolato & Gaviao, 2007), and also with status, number and tooth mobility (Miyaura et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth remembering that the bite force can be influenced according to the craniofacial morphology (16) , sex (17) , age (18) , presence of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorder (19) and number of teeth (16) . Although some studies have focused on the myofunctional orofacial condition and bite force in children with posterior crossbite, in different age groups, the results are still controversial, which makes it difficult to understand the occlusal relationship and myofunctional orofacial condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%