2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2017.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Massive segmental bone loss due to pantibial osteomyelitis in children reconstructed by medial fibular transport with Ilizarov frame

Abstract: Objectives Vascularized or non-vascularized fibula transport is a novel procedure for limb salvage but has been associated with high failure rates and complications. Ipsilateral medial fibular transport (IMFT) using Ilizarov apparatus is a modification of the procedure to prevent complications and increase success rate. This article presents the largest series of limb salvage for massive tibial bone loss in children due to pan-osteomyelitis by IMFT with Ilizarov apparatus. Methods … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is different from having non-vascularized bone grafts, while also being osteoconductive, osteoinductive and osteogenic, the grafts underwent creeping substitution process, which includes capillary, perivascular tissue and inflammatory cells invasion then gradually revascularized and ultimately absorbed to form the incorporation of the graft with the host bone. Expected long term result of tibialization is the complete incorporation of the fibula replacing the missing gap and becoming a tibia for all purposes [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is different from having non-vascularized bone grafts, while also being osteoconductive, osteoinductive and osteogenic, the grafts underwent creeping substitution process, which includes capillary, perivascular tissue and inflammatory cells invasion then gradually revascularized and ultimately absorbed to form the incorporation of the graft with the host bone. Expected long term result of tibialization is the complete incorporation of the fibula replacing the missing gap and becoming a tibia for all purposes [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limb discrepancy at presentation in addition to the massive defect appeared inapplicable as the available length of fibula for transfer is 20-24 cm. Furthermore, this procedure would extend the treatment period resulting in a significant increase in hospital cost [9,[11][12][13]. Bone graft was impractical; even from multiple donor sites, the harvested bone would not be enough to fill the massive void and is associated with morbidity of donor site [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One more technique is ipsilateral fibula expansion that is an option of radial instead of longitudinal distraction osteogenesis. Gradual fibular transfer with the Ilizarov external fixator was used in post-traumatic and post-infection large tibial bone defects[ 47 , 48 ]. Although the induced membrane technique has gained much popularity in bone defect treatment, the Ilizarov bone transport remains the main tool in the situations with bone deformity and limb length discrepancy[ 31 ].…”
Section: Current Clinical Practice and Research In The Ilizarov Techniques Of Bone Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic osteotomy techniques were discussed in regard to bone formation and the study stressed the importance of the procedure for qualitative distraction osteogenesis[ 73 ]. The regular 1-mm rate of daily lengthening, confirmed in the historical experiments by the Ilizarov’s team[ 4 ], should be followed with any fixator or adjusted down if problems appear in order to have stable bone regeneration[ 48 ]. The regenerate condition and consolidation is of primary concern to allow full weight-bearing[ 74 ].…”
Section: Current Clinical Practice and Research In The Ilizarov Techniques Of Bone Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%