2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-03950-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unprecedented tibial bone lengthening of 33.5 cm by distraction osteogenesis for the reconstruction of a subtotal tibial bone defect. A case report and literature review

Abstract: Background We present a case of an immense unprecedented tibial bone lengthening of 33.5 cm. The management of chronic osteomyelitis of the right tibia with subtotal tibial bone defect, talus defect and equinus ankle deformity. We demonstrate limb reconstruction by distraction osteogenesis and correction of ankle deformity with the Ilizarov technique. Limb salvage was preferred as an alternative to amputation to restore basic limb function. Case presentation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) patients with contraindications related to surgical treatment; (2) patients with old fractures; (3) patients with osteoporosis; (4) patients with a history of tibial surgery; (5) patients with severe blood system diseases; (6) patients complicated with severe organ dysfunction; (7) patients with severe diabetes; and (8) patients with fractures at other sites.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1) patients with contraindications related to surgical treatment; (2) patients with old fractures; (3) patients with osteoporosis; (4) patients with a history of tibial surgery; (5) patients with severe blood system diseases; (6) patients complicated with severe organ dysfunction; (7) patients with severe diabetes; and (8) patients with fractures at other sites.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to previous literature, unilateral external fixator bone lengthening is one of the effective methods for the treatment of traumatic massive bone defect of tibia. It can repair bone defects of any length without bone grafting, and the ossification rate of new bone callus is faster, which can greatly shorten the bone healing time, and the operation method is relatively simple compared with the annular external fixator [6,7]. However, this method still has some limitations, and some patients still have no improvement in knee and ankle function after treatment [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3]. Because of variable anatomical locations and geometries, conditions of periosteum and soft tissue, biomechanical environments, as well as patients' basic conditions, its treatment still remains surgical, socioeconomic and investigative challenges [2][3][4]. In particular, diaphyseal bone defect of lower limbs appears to be more challengeable due to its higher requirement for weight-bearing and walking function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%