1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf02759275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Masses of heavy hadrons in quark model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From Tables 3-1, 3-2 and 4, we can see that the inequalities (26), (29), (30) and (31) agree well with the existing experimental data [15]. These inequalities (26), (29), (30) and (31) indicate the existence of higherorder breaking effects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From Tables 3-1, 3-2 and 4, we can see that the inequalities (26), (29), (30) and (31) agree well with the existing experimental data [15]. These inequalities (26), (29), (30) and (31) indicate the existence of higherorder breaking effects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In Ref. [18], Nussinov and Lampert showed that the linear meson mass inequality (26) satisfies the experimental data of the well-established meson multiplets (vector 1 3 S 1 , tensor 1 3 P 2 , axial-vector 1 3 P 1 and scalar 1 3 P 0 ) with different flavor combinations of i and j, and the linear baryon mass inequality (30) satisfies the experimental data of the baryon octet and the baryon decuplet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, in [35] the analysis given in [36] was modified on the basis of interpolation formulae for the mass of ground state with account for the dependence of spin forces on both the wave functions and the effective coupling constant, which were changed under the quark contents of hadrons. In this way, the parameter of energy shift enters the fitting function, so that this parameter essentially changes under the transition from the description of mesons to baryons:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the leading logarithmic approximation and to the one-loop accuracy, the coefficient K J is given by the expression 36) where β 0 = 11N c /3 − 2n f /3 = 9. To evaluate the two-loop expression for C J we have to know subleading corrections in the first α s order in addition to the anomalous dimensions.…”
Section: Anomalous Dimensions For the Baryonic Currentsmentioning
confidence: 99%