2009
DOI: 10.1016/s1001-0742(08)62244-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass transfer in the absorption of SO2 and NOx using aqueous euchlorine scrubbing solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4(b)), and the manganese concentration in liquid phase appeared to be quite low (Table 3). This was mainly due to the fact that NO is insoluble and the reaction was controlled by gas-liquid mass transfer [41]. Reversely when 1800 ppm ozone was injected into system, NO x removal efficiency increased to about 75% ( Fig.…”
Section: Effects Of Ozone and Pyrolusite On No X Removal Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…4(b)), and the manganese concentration in liquid phase appeared to be quite low (Table 3). This was mainly due to the fact that NO is insoluble and the reaction was controlled by gas-liquid mass transfer [41]. Reversely when 1800 ppm ozone was injected into system, NO x removal efficiency increased to about 75% ( Fig.…”
Section: Effects Of Ozone and Pyrolusite On No X Removal Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Up to now, aqueous solutions of many oxidants have been found to be effective for NO x removal, including NaClO 2 , KMnO 4 , ClO 2 , NaClO 3 , Fenton reagent , and so on. During the absorption process, the absorption rate of NO 2 into absorption solution has great impact on the total NO x removal efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important advantage of this method, as compared with SCR, would be a large saving in capital cost [15]. However, NO must be oxidized to higher oxidation states (NO 2 , HNO 2 and HNO 3 ) which are more easily soluble in aqueous solutions and can be removed by alkaline absorbents [16][17][18]. The most well-known NO oxidants are ClO 2 or O 3 which are, however, highly expensive as well as very danger-ous for equipment especially in gas phase operations [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most well-known NO oxidants are ClO 2 or O 3 which are, however, highly expensive as well as very danger-ous for equipment especially in gas phase operations [16]. The majority of scientific works are based on using H 2 O 2 as oxidation reagent because it is known as a lower cost and environmental friendly oxidant [17]. The major operating cost for the ozone oxidation process is the cost of electricity for ozone generation and expensive ozonizers [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%