1970
DOI: 10.1021/i160036a015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass Transfer Characteristics of Woven-Wire Screen Catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
16
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(10 reference statements)
5
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decrease in the mass transfer coefficient with increasing bed thickness is consistent with the results of previous studies on fixed beds of screens in cross flow [21,22], rotating packed bed of screen discs [23] and oscillating packed bed of screens [24].…”
Section: Mass Transfer Measurement By the Limiting Currentsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The decrease in the mass transfer coefficient with increasing bed thickness is consistent with the results of previous studies on fixed beds of screens in cross flow [21,22], rotating packed bed of screen discs [23] and oscillating packed bed of screens [24].…”
Section: Mass Transfer Measurement By the Limiting Currentsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Eq. (13) closely resembles classical correlations for heat transfer to banks of tubes (Incropera and De Witt, 1996) and for heat transfer in catalytic gauzes (Satterfield and Cortez, 1970). It is also similar to the correlation for gas/solid heat transfer in metallic foams that some of us derived from independent transient cooling experiments (Giani et al, 2005b).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Notably, the observed value of the Reynolds number order (0.93) is significantly higher than that for other conventional types of the packed catalyst beds (0.47-0.85 for granular beds [35], 0.43 for foam catalysts [36], 0.425 for catalytic gauzes [37], 0.45 for honeycombs [38], 0.21-0.5 for wire mesh structures [37,[39][40][41], 0.72 for metal fiber filters [42] etc.). This phenomenon may be explained by flexibility of the GFCs.…”
Section: Mass Transfer Studiesmentioning
confidence: 90%