2002
DOI: 10.1021/jp013559+
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass Accommodation Coefficients of Phenol, 2-Nitrophenol, and 3-Methylphenol over the Temperature Range 278−298 K

Abstract: The reactive uptake of phenol, 2-nitrophenol, and 3-methylphenol (m-cresol) was measured in a vertical wettedwall flow reactor over the temperature range 278-298 K using bromine as an aqueous phase scavenger. First-order decays in gas-phase concentration as a function of increased gas-liquid contact time in the reactor were monitored by UV absorption downstream of the contact zone. Mass accommodation coefficients, R, were derived from measured uptake coefficients by correcting for limitations to mass transfer … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
19
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
7
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results (DH obs , DS obs ) are in very good agreement with the theoretical values calculated using eqns ( 11) and ( 12) and the experimental results given, for example, by Jayne et al for aliphatic alcohols, 28 by Mu¨ller and Heal for phenol, 40 by Leyssens et al for 2-nitrophenol and cresol isomers, 16 by Raja and Valsaraj for naphthalene, 41 or by Katrib et al for dimethyl-and diethylcarbonate, 37 as shown in Fig. 4 where the black points correspond to the theoretical values a The given errors are calculated with a 95% confidence interval limit using the student's t-distribution.…”
Section: Mass Accommodation Coefficientssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results (DH obs , DS obs ) are in very good agreement with the theoretical values calculated using eqns ( 11) and ( 12) and the experimental results given, for example, by Jayne et al for aliphatic alcohols, 28 by Mu¨ller and Heal for phenol, 40 by Leyssens et al for 2-nitrophenol and cresol isomers, 16 by Raja and Valsaraj for naphthalene, 41 or by Katrib et al for dimethyl-and diethylcarbonate, 37 as shown in Fig. 4 where the black points correspond to the theoretical values a The given errors are calculated with a 95% confidence interval limit using the student's t-distribution.…”
Section: Mass Accommodation Coefficientssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The mass accommodation coefficients  have been measured for the cresol isomers by Louis and coworkers (Leyssens et al, 2004) and their values at 293K are respectively equal to 6.6  10 -4 for o-cresol, 1.1  10 -3 for m-cresol, and 2.9  10 -3 for p-cresol. In addition, a value of 8.3  10 -3 for phenol at 293 K has already been reported by Müller and Heal (Müller and Heal, 2002). From the values of  the calculated accommodation time scale varies between 0.6 and 8.4 min.…”
Section: Atmospheric Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…(1) described by Jacob (2000), where r is the radius of the particle, D g is the gas-phase molecular diffusion coefficient, v is the mean molecular speed, α is the RONO 2 mass accommodation coefficient, A is the aerosol surface area per unit volume of air, and N is the gas phase RONO 2 concentration. Assuming a mass accommodation factor (α) similar to that for 2-nitrophenol, 0.012 (Muller and Heal, 2002), a D g of 0.2 cm 2 s −1 (Jacob, 2000), and a calculated v of 1.72 × 10 4 cm s −1 , the estimated timescale for uptake into the aerosol phase, τ uptake (R in /N ), was calculated to be 194 s. That value, the lower limit timescale for the loss of RONO 2 in our system after partitioning to the particle phase, is much shorter than Introduction…”
Section: Gas-particle Partitioning Of Monoterpene-derived Organic Nitmentioning
confidence: 99%