1964
Masking in Audiometry: A Clinical Evaluation of Three Methods
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
14
1
1
0
Citation Types
1
4
0
0
Year Published
1973
2023
Publication Types
Select...
13
1
1
Relationship
0
15
Authors
Journals
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
References 15 publications
1
4
0
0
“…The results obtained in the study are in closer agreement with those of Hood et al (1968) and Kirikae (1959), than with those of Hurley and Berger (1970) shown in Table I. The view (Feldman, 1961;Sanders and Rintelmann, 1964;Glorig, 1965) that no transcranial attenuation exists below 1 kHz. was not supported in this study.…”
Section: Methods Of Statistical Treatmentsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results obtained in the study are in closer agreement with those of Hood et al (1968) and Kirikae (1959), than with those of Hurley and Berger (1970) shown in Table I. The view (Feldman, 1961;Sanders and Rintelmann, 1964;Glorig, 1965) that no transcranial attenuation exists below 1 kHz. was not supported in this study.…”
Section: Methods Of Statistical Treatmentsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…According to Feldman (1961), Sanders and Rintelmann (1964) and Glorig (1965), the intensity is equal in both cochleas, whichever ear is stimulated.…”
Section: Transcranial Attenuation In Bone Conduction Audiometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinically, masked AMLAG offers several potential benefits compared to manual HWAG. As this study showed, masked AMLAG provides an opportunity for the standardization of masking, a challenging procedure with multiple variations that are frequently implemented incorrectly (Sanders & Rintelmann 1964;Yacullo 2015;Gumus et al 2016;Hamil 2016;Valente 2009). Uniformity of clinical procedures is imperative in order to reduce interclinician variability and ensure that best practices are being achieved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…While only a subset of the general population, for them masking is an essential component of hearing assessment, aiding in differential diagnosis and hearing loss management decisions. Unfortunately, masking is a time-consuming process and is often cited as one of the most challenging procedures for audiologists to learn (Sanders & Rintelmann 1964;Ho et al 2009;Valente 2009;Yacullo 2015;Gumus et al 2016;Hamil 2016). No universally accepted masking standard or guideline exists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…so called ‘far-advanced’ otosclerosis 17 . The difficulty encountered in assessing cochlear reserve in these patients depends upon a series of factors, the most important of which is probably represented by the problem of masking 18 . The limited output of the audiometers and the crossover of the masker noise can lead to an overestimation of bone-conduction level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
