2020
DOI: 10.1109/ojsp.2020.3039325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Masked-RPCA: Moving Object Detection With an Overlaying Model

Abstract: Moving object detection in a given video sequence is a pivotal step in many computer vision applications such as video surveillance. Robust Principal Component Analysis (RPCA) performs low-rank and sparse decomposition to accomplish such a task when the background is stationary and the foreground is dynamic and relatively small. A fundamental issue with the RPCA is the assumption that the low-rank and sparse components are added at each pixel, whereas in reality, the moving foreground is overlaid on the backgr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…well fits the condition of the RPCA method [28], where represents the frequency domain of rotating part which is also a low-rank matrix, represents the frequency domain of static part including the target and the jamming signal which is also a sparse matrix, and represents a noise matrix.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Fd-rpca-bss Methodsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…well fits the condition of the RPCA method [28], where represents the frequency domain of rotating part which is also a low-rank matrix, represents the frequency domain of static part including the target and the jamming signal which is also a sparse matrix, and represents a noise matrix.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Fd-rpca-bss Methodsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The Masked-RPCA (MRPCA) method [15], [47] changes the problem of foreground separation to a foreground detection problem, where a sparse foreground mask M ∈ {0, 1} hw×t is predicted instead of the typical foreground S of RPCA. In fact, using a simple threshold on S to identify foreground pixels may be insufficient when the pixel difference with the background is low, or in video with high disturbances.…”
Section: Masked Rpcamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sparsity of M and the correlation in time with M is formulated as a 1 -1 -minimization penalty term, λ 1 , λ 2 are regularization parameters and • denotes the Hadamard product. Problem (14) differs from the Masked-RPCA model [47] since our model uses a side-information branch and measurement operators H 1 and H 2 , which create learnable weights in the deep unfolding steps [36], [37]. We then follow a similar approach to [15] by reformulating the non-convex problem (14) in the augmented Lagrangian form with a dual variable U.…”
Section: Masked Rpcamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small singular value is compressed with a large amplitude, which further reduces the dynamic data component such as slow moving target in the background. Based on the above two discussions, Frobenius norm and weighted kernel norm are introduced into the model of formula (1). The improved model is as follows:…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving object detection [1,2] is a key step in many computer vision applications. The results of moving object detection are often affected by factors such as slow foreground objects, rain and snow weather, and dynamic backgrounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%