2002
DOI: 10.1177/146470002762492042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Masculine domination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of capital is field specific, and can vary in amount and importance (Huppatz, 2012). Mottier (2002) highlights how symbolic capital occurs when economic, cultural, and social capital are perceived as legitimate. The field of social media, through its interactive nature and “tagging,” demonstrates how identities can be legitimized and function as symbolic.…”
Section: A Bourdieusian Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of capital is field specific, and can vary in amount and importance (Huppatz, 2012). Mottier (2002) highlights how symbolic capital occurs when economic, cultural, and social capital are perceived as legitimate. The field of social media, through its interactive nature and “tagging,” demonstrates how identities can be legitimized and function as symbolic.…”
Section: A Bourdieusian Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Bourdieu and MacKinnon claim to have negotiated a path between the extremes of determinism and voluntarism. It is partly this claim that has led feminists to begin to consider Bourdieu's work on gender, and to question whether it might offer a corrective to the more deterministic moments of the more popular Michel Foucault (Adkins, 2003;Lovell, 2000;McNay, 1999McNay, , 2000Mottier, 2002). This recent feminist work on Bourdieu does not tend to invoke the ideas of radical feminism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work has been subject to extensive critique. As Mottier (2002: 350) notes, Bourdieu conceptualizes gender primarily in terms of sexual difference, which is why, according to her, his approach remains problematic. Dumais (2002) contends that Bourdieu’s work largely implies that ‘gender is a secondary characteristic to social class’ (p. 45).…”
Section: Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%