1981
DOI: 10.1086/227316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marriage, Women, and Social Stratification: A Theoretical Critique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Marriage/cohabitation rates reflect both the physical boundaries separating groups (or the opportunity to interact) as well as status differences between groups (i.e., do relationships form, given the opportunity?) (Haller 1981;Qian and Lichter 2007). 3 More generally, a social space approach is useful because it offers a holistic view of the racial/ethnic social structure.…”
Section: Salient Hispanic Dimension and Weak Racial Dimension: Panethmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marriage/cohabitation rates reflect both the physical boundaries separating groups (or the opportunity to interact) as well as status differences between groups (i.e., do relationships form, given the opportunity?) (Haller 1981;Qian and Lichter 2007). 3 More generally, a social space approach is useful because it offers a holistic view of the racial/ethnic social structure.…”
Section: Salient Hispanic Dimension and Weak Racial Dimension: Panethmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is common in historical research to use only men's occupations as indicators of social status. Women's occupations were not validly and reliably recorded in the 19 th century, perhaps because their social standing was determined much more by the title stated by their fathers and husbands than by their own occupations (Haller, 1981;Herr, 1995). In fact, many women who did not 'have to' work were probably economically privileged so that failing to mention an occupation can to some extent be considered as a status symbol (Matthijs, 2001).…”
Section: Fertility Limitation and Intergenerational Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of a macrolevel approach is Haller's (1981; proposition to consider marriage and family as institutions which are not only dependent on the outcome of class formation and class conflict, but also contribute crucially to the maintenance and reproduction of social inequality. According to this view, it seems necessary not only to take into consideration one married couple and their children, but a sequence of marital and familial units in order to understand the relations between family and stratification: ''The reason that the phenomenon of 'social inheritance' encompasses more than two generations does not lie, however, in the peculiar character of marriage and family relationships.…”
Section: Sociological Family Theory In Austria In the 1980smentioning
confidence: 99%