Market trends for seafood products in the USA: Implication for Southern aquaculture products

Dey, Madan M.; Surathkal, Prasanna; Chen, Oai Li; Engle, Carole R.

doi:10.1080/13657305.2017.1266710

Cited by 30 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As per capita income has increased, so has the consumption of higher‐valued seafood products (salmon and shrimp vs. cod and Alaska pollock) and product forms (fresh and/or processed and prepared vs. frozen or canned). If one is to obtain more details on the development, other data must be used, and one will typically only focus on a limited number of species or product forms, such as Dey, Surathkal, Chen, and Engle ().…”

Section: Us Seafood Consumptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Several studies find a preference for wild seafood (Davidson, Pan, Hu, & Poerwanto, ; C. A. Roheim, Bush, Asche, Sanchirico, & Uchida, ; C. Roheim, Sudhakaran, & Durham, ), although there is some evidence this can be mitigated with ecolabels for some species and in some markets (Bronnmann & Asche, ; Bronnmann & Hoffman, ). However, the development does reflect the global production patterns (Anderson et al, ) and the market development for specific species in specific regions (Dey et al, ), as well as the potential competitive advantages of aquaculture products not only with respect to control over the production process but also with control and efficiency in logistics and marketing (Asche, Cojocaru, & Roth, ; Landazuri‐Tveteraas, Asche, Gordon, & Tveteras, ). It may also be important to note that it is far from obvious that there is a clear distinction between wild and aquaculture but that the real question is a matter of control with the production process (Anderson, ).…”

Section: Us Seafood Consumptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is not too surprising that among the farmed species are the two most valuable (salmon and shrimp) and the three most successfully farmed species in terms of growth in trade (salmon, shrimp, and tilapia) (Anderson et al, 2018;Kumar & Engle, 2016 , 1990-2017 has the consumption of higher-valued seafood products (salmon and shrimp vs. cod and Alaska pollock) and product forms (fresh and/or processed and prepared vs. frozen or canned). If one is to obtain more details on the development, other data must be used, and one will typically only focus on a limited number of species or product forms, such as Dey, Surathkal, Chen, and Engle (2017).…”

Section: Overview Of Landings Imports and Exports And Aquaculturementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

U.S. seafood consumption

Shamshak

Anderson

Asche

et al. 2019

J World Aquaculture Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

U.S. seafood consumption has changed dramatically in recent decades and has become increasingly dominated by the consumption of a limited number of species that are primarily imported and predominantly sourced from aquaculture. In getting to this point, the United States has been, and still is, at the forefront of some of the most important trends in global seafood markets. Hence, discussing the factors influencing U.S. seafood consumption patterns is an interesting and informative endeavor and will most likely also have strong predictive power for the continued development of seafood markets in the United States. In this article, we will discuss the transitions in the U.S. seafood market, primarily focusing on the period from 1990 to the present, highlighting the main factors that facilitated this development. This article provides an overview of U.S. landings, aquaculture production, exports, and imports and also explores contributing trends in global export and import markets. This will be followed by a discussion of U.S. per capita consumption patterns and an examination of the consolidation of species consumed over time. Finally, implications for future trends in seafood consumption and production are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Us Seafood Consumptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Us Seafood Consumptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Overview Of Landings Imports and Exports And Aquaculturementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

U.S. seafood consumption

Shamshak

Anderson

Asche

et al. 2019

J World Aquaculture Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Americans spend $102 billion each year on seafood, predominantly at food service venues (e.g., restaurants, institutional food) [ 7 ], however, this finding has not been independently verified. Retail scanner data can explain market trends among grocery shoppers by product, region, and season [ 8 , 9 , 10 ], but these analyses have been limited to frozen and canned seafood and do not include fresh seafood. Consumers note preferences to purchase familiar types of seafood, which limits the demand for diverse fish types [ 11 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Food Sources and Expenditures for Seafood in the United States

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to explore United States (U.S.) seafood consumption patterns, food sourcing, expenditures, and geography of consumption. We analyzed seafood intake and food sourcing using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) cycles 2007–2008 to 2015–2016 for US adults ≥19 years old (n = 26,743 total respondents; n = 4957 respondents consumed seafood in the past 24 h). Seafood expenditures were extrapolated by combining NHANES with three other public datasets. U.S. adults consumed 63% of seafood (by weight) at home. The top sources of seafood (by weight) were food retail (56%), restaurants (31%), and caught by the respondent or someone they know (5%). Sixty-five percent of consumer expenditures for seafood were at restaurants and other “away from home” sources while 35% were at retail and other “at home” sources. Slightly less than half of overall U.S. food expenditures are “away from home,” which is much lower than for seafood, suggesting that consumers have very different spending habits for seafood than for an aggregate of all foods.

show abstract

“…This has changed the markets in a number of directions. Dey, Surathkal, Chen, and Engle (2017) discuss main trends in this development focusing on the U.S. market, and particularly on the impact of the development on aquaculture producers in the southern United States. Surathkal, Dey, Engle, Chidmi, and Singh (2017) investigate the substitution of three aggregate groups of frozen seafood products, breaded, entrées and un-breaded products as well as for finfish and shellfish, in the United States to investigate the impact of value-added on substitution patterns.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

New markets, new technologies and new opportunities in aquaculture

Asche

2017

Aquaculture Economics & Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Market trends for seafood products in the USA: Implication for Southern aquaculture products

Cited by 30 publications

References 13 publications

U.S. seafood consumption

U.S. seafood consumption

Food Sources and Expenditures for Seafood in the United States

New markets, new technologies and new opportunities in aquaculture

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About