2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2004.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marker genes to predict sensitivity to FK228, a histone deacetylase inhibitor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cell lines with high levels of ODC activity were more sensitive to HDAC inhibitor -induced apoptosis, and this correlation was In addition, the ability of TSA to further induce ODC activity correlated with increased sensitivity to HDAC inhibitor -induced apoptosis. In microarray studies, HDAC inhibitor treatment of various cell lines induces ODC mRNA (46,47). We found that TSA treatment increased ODC protein levels (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Cell lines with high levels of ODC activity were more sensitive to HDAC inhibitor -induced apoptosis, and this correlation was In addition, the ability of TSA to further induce ODC activity correlated with increased sensitivity to HDAC inhibitor -induced apoptosis. In microarray studies, HDAC inhibitor treatment of various cell lines induces ODC mRNA (46,47). We found that TSA treatment increased ODC protein levels (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Early differential display experiments with lymphoid cell lines cultured with TSA showed that only 2% of 340 genes examined were altered in their expression, either increased or decreased, compared to untreated cells (Van Lint et al, 1996). Recent studies using cDNA arrays showed as many as 7-10% of genes were altered in their expression in cell lines of leukemia, multiple myeloma, and carcinomas of colon, bladder, kidney, prostate and breast, cultured for up to 48 h with butyrate, TSA, MS-275, vorinostat or FK228 (depsipeptide) using twofold change as the cut-off value (Chambers et al, 2003;Glaser et al, 2003;Mitsiades et al, 2004;Peart et al, 2005;Sasakawa et al, 2005). The time of culture, concentration and the HDACi used affect the number of genes detected with altered transcription.…”
Section: Hdaci Selectively Alters Gene Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time of culture, concentration and the HDACi used affect the number of genes detected with altered transcription. Short time points (Chambers et al, 2003;Mitsiades et al, 2004;Sasakawa et al, 2005) and low concentrations (Glaser et al, 2003) (Glaser et al, 2003;Gray et al, 2004;Mitsiades et al, 2004;Peart et al, 2005;Sasakawa et al, 2005). In these several studies, it has been found that HDACi induce about as many genes as are repressed.…”
Section: Hdaci Selectively Alters Gene Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,4 The HDAC inhibitor, depsipeptide, can induce apoptosis, 3 growth inhibition 1 and differentiation of tumor cells. 4,14 Furthermore, direct intratumoral administration of depsipeptide can significantly increase both the levels of expression of delivered genes and the antitumor effects produced by non-viral approaches in mice. 9,24 Specifically, local administration of depsipeptide with HVJ liposomes directly into subcutaneous B16 melanoma tumors increased reporter gene activity 3.3-fold in injected tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depsipeptide differentially affects tumor cells versus normal cells. 4,14,15 Therefore, we assessed whether i.v. co-injection of depsipeptide with PEI:DNA complexes encoding the wild-type human p53 gene produced differential effects on human p53 expression in metastatic tumors versus in adjacent normal cells within tumor-bearing mice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%