2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-004-1636-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marker-assisted selection in segregating generations of self-fertilizing crops

Abstract: Computer simulations were used to study the efficiency of MAS for breeding self-fertilizing crops, based on a general model including additive, dominance and epistasis. It was shown that MAS not only gave larger genetic responses but also dramatically increased the frequencies of superior genotypes as compared with phenotypic selection. However, the advantages of MAS over phenotypic selection were considerably reduced when conducting selection in later generations. A modified method combining MAS in early gene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculations in Figure 8 (figure on the right-hand side) show that the contribution decreases with increasing number of accelerated generations. This is in agreement with the trend pointed out by Liu et al (2004) who suggested that MBS is less effective when applied in later generations. In conclusion, our calculations do not substantiate the superiority of systems F 5 + MBS, F 6 + MBS and F 7 + MBS over that of system F 4 + MBS; F 6 + MBS and F 7 + MBS will not be rewardingly effective, while system F 5 + MBS may be selected in some cases when L as well as L 1 is large and the necessary cost can be afforded.…”
Section: Effectiveness Of System F 4 + Mbs Compared To Gab With Longesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The calculations in Figure 8 (figure on the right-hand side) show that the contribution decreases with increasing number of accelerated generations. This is in agreement with the trend pointed out by Liu et al (2004) who suggested that MBS is less effective when applied in later generations. In conclusion, our calculations do not substantiate the superiority of systems F 5 + MBS, F 6 + MBS and F 7 + MBS over that of system F 4 + MBS; F 6 + MBS and F 7 + MBS will not be rewardingly effective, while system F 5 + MBS may be selected in some cases when L as well as L 1 is large and the necessary cost can be afforded.…”
Section: Effectiveness Of System F 4 + Mbs Compared To Gab With Longesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Molecular markers may facilitate gamete selection in the identification of early-generation populations that continue to possess the desired alleles ). Liu et al (2004) found in computer simulations that marker-assisted selection of self-fertilized crops was more advantageous in earlier generations. Marker-assisted selection in early generations allows the elimination of breeding lines having inferior genotypes while maintaining sufficient variability to produce superior breeding lines in later generations.…”
Section: Backcrossmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Data simulated by Liu et al (2004) illustrate that the frequency of superior homozygous genotypes for the main t genotypes is five times higher than that obtained by phenotypic selection in early generations (F 2 to F 4 ) and three times higher than phenotypic selection in the more advanced generations (F 5 to F 7 ). In the SSD method, where phenotypic selection is performed only in advanced generations, MAS used in the early as well as in advanced stages present frequency of superior homozygous genotypes for the main t genotypes three times higher than phenotypic selection in advanced phases.…”
Section: Mas For Qtl In Self-pollination Breeding Programsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Liu et al (2004) proposed an index to rank the plants based on the weighted sum of all possible genotypic values.…”
Section: Mas For Qtl In Self-pollination Breeding Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%