2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-009-9911-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achievements and limitations of contemporary common bean breeding using conventional and molecular approaches

Abstract: Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) improvement programs have been successful using conventional breeding methods to accomplish a wide array of important objectives. Specific achievements include the extension of range of adaptation of the crop, the development of cultivars with enhanced levels of disease and pest resistance and breeding lines that possess greater tolerance to drought. The most effective breeding method depends on the expression and inheritance of the trait to be selected and the target enviro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
75
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 275 publications
(354 reference statements)
1
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kelly and Vallejo (2004) stated that SEactMcca molecular marker is successful in detection of germplasms carrying Co-1 gene and Co-1 2 , Co-1 3 alleles; however it is incapable of detecting the other alleles of Co-1 gene. It has been emphasized several times in the literature that markers of resistance genes of especially Andean origin are inadequate and it is a necessity to develop new molecular markers for other resistance genes of Andean origin (Kelly & Vallejo, 2004;Vallejo & Kelly, 2005;Beaver & Osorno, 2009). Since the aim of our study was to transfer the Co-1 gene to registration candidate lines (T23, TK57, TK1, Ç31, Ç28, T7, T26, TK15 and T21) that are known not to carry Co-1 gene of especially Andean origin from our previous studies (Madakbaş et al, 2009a), the six combinations of hybrid F 2 population were chosen confidently for use in the backcross studies because they have the resistant phenotype and they carry molecular Co-1 marker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kelly and Vallejo (2004) stated that SEactMcca molecular marker is successful in detection of germplasms carrying Co-1 gene and Co-1 2 , Co-1 3 alleles; however it is incapable of detecting the other alleles of Co-1 gene. It has been emphasized several times in the literature that markers of resistance genes of especially Andean origin are inadequate and it is a necessity to develop new molecular markers for other resistance genes of Andean origin (Kelly & Vallejo, 2004;Vallejo & Kelly, 2005;Beaver & Osorno, 2009). Since the aim of our study was to transfer the Co-1 gene to registration candidate lines (T23, TK57, TK1, Ç31, Ç28, T7, T26, TK15 and T21) that are known not to carry Co-1 gene of especially Andean origin from our previous studies (Madakbaş et al, 2009a), the six combinations of hybrid F 2 population were chosen confidently for use in the backcross studies because they have the resistant phenotype and they carry molecular Co-1 marker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite there still being limitations to contemporary common bean breeding, genomics-assisted techniques have been widely exploited in this species, and have enhanced the effectiveness of breeding programs and responses to selection (Beaver and Osorno 2009;Tuberosa et al 2011). Marker-assisted selection is often routinely used for traits controlled by major loci, although marker-assisted selection for complex quantitative traits still remains a challenging task in breeding programs (Miklas et al 2006;Tuberosa et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In common bean, the well-established divergence between the Andean and Mesoamerican gene pools predicates a preference for Andean x Mesoamerican crosses to maximize polymorphisms at the molecular level (Kwak and Gepts, 2009;Vlasova et al, 2016). However, most crosses in bean breeding often involve parents from the same gene pool or even closely related parents to increase progress from selection and avoid hybrid weakness (Beaver and Osorno, 2009), thereby limiting the potential for polymorphism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%