Physical Properties of Polymers Handbook 2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-69002-5_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mark–Houwink–Staudinger–Sakurada Constants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Reaction conditions: 40 °C, 1 bar ethylene pressure, 30 min, 100 mL n ‐heptane, solid support: SiO 2 , 1 mmol Triisobutylaluminum, 2 μmol [Cr], 2 mmol MAO, a=g PE mmol −1 h −1 bar −1 , b: intrinsic viscosity, c: Mv calculated with Mark‐Houwink equation from intrinsic viscosity with K =6.2 ⋅ 10 −4 ⋅ dL g −1 α [41] =0.7, d: crystallinity of PE. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Reaction conditions: 40 °C, 1 bar ethylene pressure, 30 min, 100 mL n ‐heptane, solid support: SiO 2 , 1 mmol Triisobutylaluminum, 2 μmol [Cr], 2 mmol MAO, a=g PE mmol −1 h −1 bar −1 , b: intrinsic viscosity, c: Mv calculated with Mark‐Houwink equation from intrinsic viscosity with K =6.2 ⋅ 10 −4 ⋅ dL g −1 α [41] =0.7, d: crystallinity of PE. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Reaction conditions: 40 °C, 1 bar of ethylene, 30 min, 100 mL of n ‐heptane, 2 μmol [Cr], 2 mmol MAO, solid support: SiO 2 , co‐monomer: 1‐hexene, 1 mmol Triisobutylaluminum, a=g PE mmol −1 h −1 bar −1 , b: intrinsic viscosity, c: Mv calculated with Mark‐Houwink equation from intrinsic viscosity with K =6.2 ⋅ 10 −4 ⋅ dL g −1 α [41] =0.7, d: 1‐hexene content determined by 1 H NMR spectroscopy of PE in tetrachloroethane at 120 °C, e: crystallinity of PE. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… a Conditions: 40 °C, 1 bar, 30 min, 100 mL of toluene, 2 μmol of [Cr], 2 mmol of MAO. b Supported catalyst, 100 mL of n -heptane, 1 mmol of triisobutylaluminum. c Supported catalyst, 110 mL of n -heptane, 1 mmol of triisobutylaluminum 5 bar of ethylene pressure. d GPC analysis not performed due to very high intrinsic viscosity. e M v calculated with Mark–Houwink equation from intrinsic viscosities with K = 6.2 × 10 –4 dL g –1 and α = 0.7 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… e M v calculated with Mark–Houwink equation from intrinsic viscosities with K = 6.2 × 10 –4 dL g –1 and α = 0.7 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shi et al calculated the M w of the thermoplastic starch as (1.48 ± 0.19) × 10 6 g mol −1 using a static laser light scattering. In light of the discussion made in these studies, intrinsic viscosity and molecular weight of the most promising biocomposite film were calculated as 0.1973 dL g −1 and 46590.64 g mol −1 , respectively, by using Mark–Houwink constants ( K = 13.2 × 10 −3 mL g −1 and a = 0.68) given by Zeng et al The most promising biocomposite film with these properties seems to fulfill the requirements for being a packaging material with the needed texture structure and mechanical integrity. This is already indicated by a long‐term exposure (1 month) at room temperature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%