2017
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160606
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marine soundscape shaped by fishing activity

Abstract: Marine communities face anthropogenic pressures that degrade ecosystems. Because underwater soundscapes carry information about habitat quality, we explored whether destructive impacts of fishing could be evaluated via the soundscape. Maerl beds are recognized as biodiversity hotspots and they experience major worldwide degradation owing to fishing. We collected field acoustic recordings in maerl beds exposed to different fishing practices. We found that unfished maerl beds were threefold louder and exhibited … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dredging also particularly “smoothers” maerl beds seascape and thereby reduces spatial complexity 22 . It therefore strongly modifies the composition of associated benthic fauna community with lower diversity, abundances, and biomass found in dredged compared to unfished areas 19,23,24 . Dredging-induced structural and biological changes of maerl beds are likely affecting the many important ecosystem functions displayed by this habitat in term of sediment budget, organic matter processing and therefore (“blue”) carbon storage capacity 25 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dredging also particularly “smoothers” maerl beds seascape and thereby reduces spatial complexity 22 . It therefore strongly modifies the composition of associated benthic fauna community with lower diversity, abundances, and biomass found in dredged compared to unfished areas 19,23,24 . Dredging-induced structural and biological changes of maerl beds are likely affecting the many important ecosystem functions displayed by this habitat in term of sediment budget, organic matter processing and therefore (“blue”) carbon storage capacity 25 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these difficult‐to‐access aquatic environments where visibility can be limited, sound is often a principle means of animal communication, and this acoustic communication presents an opportunity for researchers to conduct long‐term, high‐resolution acoustic monitoring (Jansson, ; Luczkovich, Mann, & Rountree, ). Thus far, almost all underwater acoustic studies that aim to evaluate biological diversity or habitat condition have focused on marine habitats (Coquereau, Lossent, Grall, & Chauvaud, ; Freeman et al., ; Harris, Shears, & Radford, ; Miksis‐Olds, ; Parks, Miksis‐Olds, & Denes, ; cf. Desjonquères et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Sonic Kayak system could be used to record samples of underwater sounds over both dead and alive maerl beds to assist with assessments of biodiversity and future management. A similar approach has been utilised in other northeastern Atlantic maerl beds, where acoustic recordings were used to compare the ecosystem health of areas with different levels of fishing activity (Coquereau et al, 2017). Disadvantages of this system for research use include the necessity to stop paddling for recording data due to the paddle noise, the unlikeliness of gathering data overnight and potentially dawn and dusk where biological noise is greatest (Radford 28 et al, 2008a;Radford et al, 2008b;Ghazali et al, 2013;Ricci et al, 2017), and the possibility for limiting weather conditions.…”
Section: Applications For Underwater Sound Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%