2020
DOI: 10.1017/rdc.2020.127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marine Reservoir Effects in Seal (Phocidae) Bones in the Northern Bering and Chukchi Seas, Northwestern Alaska

Abstract: We explore marine reservoir effects (MREs) in seal bones from the northern Bering and Chukchi Seas regions. Ringed and bearded seals have served as dietary staples in human populations along the coasts of Arctic northeast Asia and North America for several millennia. Radiocarbon (14C) dates on seal bones and terrestrial materials (caribou, plants seeds, wood, and wood charcoal) were compared from archaeological sites in the Bering Strait region of northwestern Alaska to assess MREs in these sea mammals over ti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same argument applies to the possible effect of permafrost burial in time. Another possible alteration of the 14 C content of the wood may come from contamination by external elements in the house, such as marine mammal oil, but the offset of marine carbon measurements is a few hundred years, not several thousand (Dumond & Griffin, 2002;Krus et al, 2019;Reuther et al, 2020). Moreover, wood cross-sections were not impregnated with chemicals in the 1950's as it was usual to glue archaeological cross-sections to consolidate them.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same argument applies to the possible effect of permafrost burial in time. Another possible alteration of the 14 C content of the wood may come from contamination by external elements in the house, such as marine mammal oil, but the offset of marine carbon measurements is a few hundred years, not several thousand (Dumond & Griffin, 2002;Krus et al, 2019;Reuther et al, 2020). Moreover, wood cross-sections were not impregnated with chemicals in the 1950's as it was usual to glue archaeological cross-sections to consolidate them.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 14 C dates run on marine-based organisms (marine mammals; dogs at maritime sites; and humans with a significant part of the diet from marine food) are also excluded, especially from records for the Zhokhov and Ekven sites (see Khassanov and Savinetsky 2006;. It is now clear that the reservoir age for marine-based substances in the Arctic (Sea of Okhotsk, Bering Sea, and seas of the Arctic Ocean) is quite high, with the R value up to 750-1100 years (see Dumond and Griffin 2002;Khassanov and Savinetsky 2006;Kuzmin et al 2007;Yoneda et al 2007;Khasanov et al 2015Khasanov et al , 2022Reuther et al 2021). It is therefore impossible to use 14 C values run on marine samples (or bones of humans who consumed significant amounts of aquatic food) to establish their true age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paired ringed seal and terrestrial sample 14 C dates from Walakpa, on the northern tip of Alaska ( Krus et al, 2019 ), yield an average R ( t ) of 864 ± 105 years. Paired terrestrial and seal sample data from Reuther et al (2021) , from the region in question ( Figure 1 ), yield a reservoir age of 831 ± 132 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%