2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marine Predator Algorithm based Cascaded PIDA Load Frequency Controller for Electric Power Systems with Wave Energy Conversion Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Original MPA MPA is proposed to optimize controller parameters for PIDA Load Frequency [159] Configuration of autonomous system…”
Section: Pida Load Frequency Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Original MPA MPA is proposed to optimize controller parameters for PIDA Load Frequency [159] Configuration of autonomous system…”
Section: Pida Load Frequency Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For ME, the qualified index of water pollution is an important goal of natural water environment quality management. Once a sudden risk of water pollution in the natural water ecological environment occurs in a region, under the combined driving force of various natural winds and water currents, The spread of pollutants may change in an instant, affecting the quality of water extracted by residents, thereby greatly increasing the management cost and difficulty of the ME environment [15][16].…”
Section: Frontiers In Ocean Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the performance efficacy of classical controllers is more likely to be dependent upon the optimization algorithms that have been deployed to optimize the controller gains. Several population-and stochastic-based searching algorithms reported in domain of LFC in optimizing classical controllers are chaotic atom search optimization (CASO) (Irudayaraj et al, 2022), many-objective optimization approach (MOOA) (Hajiakbari Fini et al, 2016), chaotic crow search (CCS) algorithm (Khokhar et al, 2021), gray wolf optimizer (GWO) (Sharma and Saikia, 2015), quadratic approach with pole compensator (QAWPC) (Hanwate and Hote, 2018), marine predator algorithm (MPA) (Yakout et al, 2021), Hooke-Jeeve's optimizer (HJO) (Chatterjee, 2010), quasioppositional harmony search algorithm (QOHSA) (Shankar and Mukherjee, 2016), chemical reaction optimizer (CRO) (Mohanty and Hota, 2018), hybrid artificial electric field algorithm (HAEFA) (Sai Kalyan et al, 2020), bacteria foraging optimization (BFOA) (Ali and Elazim, 2015), mine blast optimizer (MBO) (Alattar et al, 2019), particle swarm optimizer (PSO) (Magid and Abido, 2003), differential evolution (DE) (Kalyan and Suresh, 2021), combination of DE with pattern search (Sahu et al, 2015a) and AEFA (DE-AEFA) (Kalyan and Rao, 2021a), grasshopper optimizer (GHO), and cuckoo search approach (CSA) (Latif et al, 2018). Moreover, the conventional controllers exhibit efficacy in linearized models and could not maintain the stability of nonlinear interconnected power systems (IPS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%