Marine mammal research: its relationship to other scientific disciplines and to wider society

Evans, Peter G. H.; Anderwald, Pia; Wright, Andrew

doi:10.1017/s0025315414000848

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 19 publications

(25 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Highly mobile cetacean species, however, often show genetic and morphological differentiation over smaller geographic scales [5]. The determinants of genetic structure in cetacean species are often complex–local environmental differences, ecological specializations along with complex social and behavioral structure can promote divergence [1,6–8]. For instance, many species are known to migrate seasonally around feeding grounds, but may return to distinct areas for mating and breeding [9–13].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spatially Explicit Analysis of Genome-Wide SNPs Detects Subtle Population Structure in a Mobile Marine Mammal, the Harbor Porpoise

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The population structure of the highly mobile marine mammal, the harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena), in the Atlantic shelf waters follows a pattern of significant isolation-by-distance. The population structure of harbor porpoises from the Baltic Sea, which is connected with the North Sea through a series of basins separated by shallow underwater ridges, however, is more complex. Here, we investigated the population differentiation of harbor porpoises in European Seas with a special focus on the Baltic Sea and adjacent waters, using a population genomics approach. We used 2872 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), derived from double digest restriction-site associated DNA sequencing (ddRAD-seq), as well as 13 microsatellite loci and mitochondrial haplotypes for the same set of individuals. Spatial principal components analysis (sPCA), and Bayesian clustering on a subset of SNPs suggest three main groupings at the level of all studied regions: the Black Sea, the North Atlantic, and the Baltic Sea. Furthermore, we observed a distinct separation of the North Sea harbor porpoises from the Baltic Sea populations, and identified splits between porpoise populations within the Baltic Sea. We observed a notable distinction between the Belt Sea and the Inner Baltic Sea sub-regions. Improved delineation of harbor porpoise population assignments for the Baltic based on genomic evidence is important for conservation management of this endangered cetacean in threatened habitats, particularly in the Baltic Sea proper. In addition, we show that SNPs outperform microsatellite markers and demonstrate the utility of RAD-tags from a relatively small, opportunistically sampled cetacean sample set for population diversity and divergence analysis.

show abstract