1. Monitoring spatial and temporal patterns in cetacean abundance involves a variety of approaches depending upon the target species and the resources available. As a first step, the collection of incidental sightings or strandings information aids the construction of a species list and a rough measure of status and seasonal variation in abundance. These often make use of networks of volunteer observers although the wide variation in abilities and experience means that special attention must be paid to training and to data quality control. More robust monitoring of numbers requires quantification of effort and some correction for factors that influence detectability, such as sea state. 2. The presence of cetaceans may be recorded visually, or indirectly by acoustics. Each has advantages and disadvantages, and their applicability may vary between species. The use of fixed stations tends to allow sustained monitoring at relatively low cost but coverage is limited to the immediate vicinity. For more extensive coverage, mobile platforms are necessary. Platforms of opportunity such as ferries, whale‐watching boats, etc. are often used to survey areas at low cost. These may allow repeat observations to be made over time, but with no control over where the vessel goes, it is typically not possible to sample wide areas, thus limiting abundance estimation. 3. Line transect surveys using dedicated platforms allow representative coverage of areas from which abundance estimates can be made (either using indices or absolute measures derived from density estimation). Assumptions relating to detectability and responsiveness need to be addressed and various methods (such as two‐platform surveys) have been developed to accommodate these. 4. For some cetacean species, mark‐recapture methods can be applied using photo‐identification of recognizable individuals. Again, a number of assumptions are made, particularly relating to recognizability, representativeness of sampling and capture probabilities. Capturing, on film, as many animals in the population as possible helps to reduce the problem of heterogeneity of capture probabilities. Mark‐recapture methods require at least two sampling occasions. If multiple sampling is employed, either open or closed population models can be used. 5. Measuring population change represents a particular challenge for mobile animals such as cetaceans. Changes in ranging patterns may have a large impact on abundance estimates unless very large areas are adequately covered. Power analysis is a useful method to indicate the ability of the data to detect a trend of a given magnitude. Increasingly, spatial modelling using GLMs and GAMs is being used to provide a better understanding of the biotic and hydrographic factors influencing cetacean distribution.

No abstract

There is substantial geographic variation in the behavior and social structure of sperm whales worldwide. The population in the Eastern Caribbean is thought to be isolated from other areas in the North Atlantic. We describe the behavior and social structure of the sperm whales identified off Dominica during an eight year study (2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012); 92% of photographic identifications) with supplementary data collected from seven other organizations dating as far back as 1981. A total of 419 individuals were identified. Resighting rates (42% of individuals between years) and encounter rates with sperm whale groups (mean = 80.4% of days at sea) among this population were both comparatively high. Group sizes were small (7-9 individuals) and were comprised of just one social unit (mean = 6.76 individuals, SD = 2.80). We described 17 units which have been reidentified off Dominica across 2-27 yr. Mature males are seen regularly off Dominica, but residency in the area lasts only a few days to a few weeks. Males were reidentified across years spanning up to a decade. Management of this population within the multinational Wider Caribbean Region will require governments to work towards international agreements governing sperm whales as a cross-border species of concern.

No abstract

The distribution, movements and abundance of highly mobile marine species such as bottlenose dolphins Tursiops truncatus are best studied at large spatial scales, but previous research effort has generally been focused on relatively small areas, occupied by populations with high site fidelity. We aimed to characterize the distribution, movements and abundance of bottlenose dolphins around the coasts of Scotland, exploring how data from multiple sources could be integrated to build a broader‐scale picture of their ecology. We reviewed existing historical data, integrated data from ongoing studies and developed new collaborative studies to describe distribution patterns. We adopted a Bayesian multi‐site mark‐recapture model to estimate abundance of bottlenose dolphins throughout Scottish coastal waters and quantified movements of individuals between study areas. The majority of sightings of bottlenose dolphins around the Scottish coastline are concentrated on the east and west coasts, but records are rare before the 1990s. Dedicated photo‐identification studies in 2006 and 2007 were used to estimate the size of two resident populations: one on the east coast from the Moray Firth to Fife, population estimate 195 [95% highest posterior density intervals (HPDI): 162–253] and the second in the Hebrides, population estimate 45 (95% HPDI: 33–66). Interaction parameters demonstrated that the dolphins off the east coast of Scotland are highly mobile, whereas those off the west coast form two discrete communities. We provide the first comprehensive assessment of the abundance of bottlenose dolphins in the inshore waters of Scotland. The combination of dedicated photo‐identification studies and opportunistic sightings suggest that a relatively small number of bottlenose dolphins (200–300 individuals) occur regularly in Scottish coastal waters. On both east and west coasts, re‐sightings of identifiable individuals indicate that the animals have been using these coastal areas since studies began.

(1) Seabird‐cetacean associations involve many genera. (2) Some seabirds/cetaceans associate with more species than others, e.g. minke and pilot whales, Common dolphins and porpoises amongst cetaceans, and gannet & kittiwake amongst seabirds. Killer whale, sperm whale, shag and cormorant have not been recorded in associations, in the N.E. Atlantic. (3) All observed associations would be predicted on the basis of the diets of the associated species. (4) Most associations are probably opportunistic or incidental, as a result of concentration of shared prey. (5) Some species, however, may associate more regularly, e.g. minke & pilot whales, Common dolphin and porpoise amongst cetaceans and gannet amongst seabirds. It is not possible to say which derives benefit from the association, but on theoretical grounds it is most likely to be the seabird. (6) Minke and pilot whales may drive towards the surface food normally out of reach of seabirds, particularly Procellariformes. Common dolphins feed by herding fast‐moving fish shoals into tight groups which will be a more concentrated food source for diving sea‐birds, such as gannets, and make food more accessible to other species. Porpoises may achieve the same result with inshore shoals of sprats and sand eels, particularly for auks and kittiwakes, and terns.

Most information on the distribution, movements and ecology of cetaceans in the N.E. Atlantic have come from whale catches mainly in the early part of this century, and from strandings records collected by the British Museum (Nat. Hist.). With the formation of the Cetacean Group in 1973, a scheme for recording live cetaceans at sea was started. This paper summarizes the results of about two thousand sightings involving nearly 25,000 individual animals between the years 1958– 1978 (but mainly from the last 10 years), and relates them to existing information collected from other sources. Difficulties of identification and potential sources of bias are discussed. Most large cetaceans are present in British waters as part of a latitudinal feeding migration whereas smaller species may be present in the N.E. Atlantic throughout the year with movements being mainly of an offshore‐inshore nature. Some species are clearly very rare probably as a result of over‐exploitation in the last century and early part of this century. These include the Right whale, Blue whale and probably Humpback whale. Other species are rarely recorded because their usual range is some distance from British waters. These include narwhal and White whale (from Arctic waters), Pygmy sperm whale, smaller beaked whales and Euphrosyne dolphin (from warm temperate to tropical waters). The Harbour porpoise is by far the most common and widespread species in British waters, occurring mainly in inshore waters, although it has apparently declined in certain regions (e.g. Southern North Sea, English Channel, Irish Sea) in recent years probably as a result of pollution, disturbance and/or over‐exploitation of food resources. Bottle‐nosed and Risso's dolphins are also widely distributed close to the coast, although the latter is restricted to the west and south coasts and the former is associated particularly with some large estuaries. Common dolphins are relatively abundant and widespread, and are more pelagic than the previous three species. White‐sided dolphins have a mainly pelagic distribution centred on the Northern North Sea whilst the White‐sided dolphin has a wider distribution which includes all the western seaboard. Of larger cetaceans, the Killer whale is relatively common particularly on the west coasts and the Pilot whale is locally and seasonally abundant at the north and south ends of Britain and Ireland where they probably represent distinct populations. The Bottlenose whale, Minke, Fin and Sei whales are confined to the west and north coasts, all but the Minke whale having a primarily pelagic distribution. Sperm whales although increasingly commonly stranded on British coasts, are rarely sighted in inshore waters. The west coast of Britain and Ireland are the most important regions for cetaceans whereas the Southern North Sea has the smallest number although in previous decades numbers were probably higher. Most cetacean species occur mainly in the summer months, particularly August and September, although some species, e.g. White‐sid...

1. Distribution maps of cetaceans and seabirds at basin and monthly scales are needed for conservation and marine management. These are usually created from standardized and systematic aerial and vessel surveys, with recorded animal densities interpolated across study areas. However, distribution maps at basin and monthly scales have previously not been possible because individual surveys have restricted spatial and temporal coverage.2. This study develops an alternative approach consisting of: (a) collating diverse survey data to maximize spatial and temporal coverage, (b) using detection functions to estimate variation in the surface area covered (km 2 ) among these surveys, 254 | Journal of Applied Ecology WAGGITT eT Al. Synthesis and applications.This study provides the largest ever collation and standardization of diverse survey data for cetaceans and seabirds, and the most comprehensive distribution maps of these taxa in the North-East Atlantic. These distribution maps have numerous applications including the identification of important areas needing protection, and the quantification of overlap between vulnerable species and anthropogenic activities. This study demonstrates how the analysis of existing and diverse survey data can meet conservation and marine management needs.