1995
DOI: 10.1016/0025-326x(94)00192-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marine litter monitoring programmes—A review of methods with special reference to national surveys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
62
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
62
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The most commonly used method is monitoring through beach surveys [1]. Both in Korea and abroad, many studies have been undertaken to determine levels of beach litter, its spatial distribution, composition, and morphology using monitoring methods [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. The National Marine Debris Monitoring Program (NMDMP) is an example of such a monitoring program that was conducted at the national level in the United States.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used method is monitoring through beach surveys [1]. Both in Korea and abroad, many studies have been undertaken to determine levels of beach litter, its spatial distribution, composition, and morphology using monitoring methods [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. The National Marine Debris Monitoring Program (NMDMP) is an example of such a monitoring program that was conducted at the national level in the United States.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 remains a difficult issue to address in many countries due to their varied sources, distribution and seasonal changes causing difficulties in the source prediction and likewise its management 1) . Any trash has the potential to become marine debris if not well managed.…”
Section: Prefacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is for this reason that a preliminary characterization of the solid waste found on beaches serves as a tool for determining the potential risks in a place. These characteristics include size (RIBIC et al 1992), the composition of the waste (DIXON, DIXON 1983), and polluting source (CLAEREBOUDT 2004;REES, POND 1995). From this information, program measures can be elaborated favoring a new approach on this issue and measures can be sought, which may stop or minimize these problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%