Marguerite Duras/Claude Régy: L'Amante Anglaise, gênese de uma escrita, gestação de um teatro

Grésillon, Almuth; Mervant-Roux, Marie-Madeleine

doi:10.1590/2237-266038117

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A key driver of Genetic Criticism (e.g., Grésillon and Mervant-Roux 2010) is the acquisition of Heinrich Heine's manuscripts by the Paris National Library in 1966. In 1968, a research group was commissioned to analyze these manuscripts.…”

Section: Collecting Data About Writing Processesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Prototype version analyses trace linguistic products (e.g., Sanders and Van Wijk 1996) and elaborate on the changes in text features from version to version, be it at one single production site or across a series of sites. In the framework of Genetic Criticism for example, close-to-final versions of literary writing were compared (Mahrer 2006) and play writing was tracked from the initial draft to the authors' notes on first performances (Grésillon and Mervant-Roux 2010). In projects similar to Idée suisse, a quote from a politician's original utterance was traced throughout the intertextual chain of correspondents, local and global news agencies, broadcasters, and the follow-up discourse in social media (Perrin 2011).…”

Section: The Materials Focus: Tracking Intertextual Chains With Versiomentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

5 Methodology: From speaking about writing to tracking text production

Grésillon¹,

Perrin²

2014

Handbook of Writing and Text Production

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Doing writing research from an applied linguistics perspective means investigating individual, collaborative, and organizational writing and text production as language-based activities in complex and dynamic real-life contexts. In doing so, micro and macro levels, product and process perspectives, as well as theoretical and practical questions are combined in transdisciplinary approaches. Appropriate methods have to be deliberately chosen and transparently explained across disciplinary boundaries. Methodological questions need to be clarified, such as: which method fits which problem -and how should and can various methods complement each other?In this chapter, we start from two methodologically complementary ways of doing research into real-life writing processes (Part 1). These approaches illustrate why collecting data represents a key problem in the history of writing research (2). We then outline a typology of state-of-the-art methods in writing research (3) and explain challenges of combining perspectives and methods in research projects (4). This allows us to evaluate what sophisticated methodology in writing research can contribute to applied linguistics (5) and to conclude by sketching a related research roadmap (6). In the reference section, we focus on work combining approaches from writing research and applied linguistics in methodologically innovative ways (7).

show abstract

Section: Collecting Data About Writing Processesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Materials Focus: Tracking Intertextual Chains With Versiomentioning

confidence: 99%