2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58592-1_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Margin-Mix: Semi-Supervised Learning for Face Expression Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although existing studies have evaluated models exclusively against the entirety of the CAFE data set [34][35][36][37][38][39], we additionally evaluated them on Subset A and Subset B of CAFE, as defined by the authors of the data set. Subset A contains images that were identified with an accuracy of 60% or above by 100 adult participants [54], with a Cronbach α internal consistency score of .82 (versus .77 for the full CAFE data set).…”
Section: Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although existing studies have evaluated models exclusively against the entirety of the CAFE data set [34][35][36][37][38][39], we additionally evaluated them on Subset A and Subset B of CAFE, as defined by the authors of the data set. Subset A contains images that were identified with an accuracy of 60% or above by 100 adult participants [54], with a Cronbach α internal consistency score of .82 (versus .77 for the full CAFE data set).…”
Section: Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing use of signals from sensors on mobile devices, such as the selfie camera, opens many possibilities for real-time analysis of image data for continuous phenotyping and repeated diagnoses in home settings [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. However, facial emotion classifiers and the underlying data sets on which they are trained have been tailored to neurotypical adults, as demonstrated by repeatedly low performance on image data sets of pediatric emotion expressions [34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They explore different methods, such as analysing Facebook status updates to detect depression ( Ali et al, 2022 ) and predicting suicide risk and mental health problems on Twitter through multitask learning ( Benton et al, 2017 ) and depression prediction ( de Souza et al, 2022 ) on Reddit. Regarding facial expression recognition, some works ( Florea et al, 2019 ; Giannakakis et al, 2017 ; Huang et al, 2016 ) also address anxiety detection using machine learning techniques. However, all of these works use either pre-processed text datasets, which provide textual features of the mental disorder, or facial prediction datasets, which contain images of individuals with anxiety, for training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a comprehensive review of the most commonly used classical and neural network strategies for interpreting and recognising facial expressions of emotion ( Canal et al, 2022 ) has been conducted. In terms of machine learning techniques for facial emotion recognition, Florea et al (2019) propose to predict anxiety/stress in children using the Annealed Label Transfer method. In addition, Giannakakis et al (2017) develop a framework for the detection and analysis of stress/anxiety, focusing on non-voluntary and semi-voluntary facial signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SSL explores both labeled data and unlabeled data simultaneously in order to mitigate the requirement for labeled data. Many SSL models have presented excellent performance in computer vision and machine learning [28], [29], and they can be categorized into two broad categories: pseudo-labeling [30] and consistency regularization [31], [32]. For a systematic review of SSL in FER, please refer to [33].…”
Section: B Deep Learning-based Semi-supervised Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%