2004
DOI: 10.1300/j104v38n01_08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marcive GPO Records and Authority Control: An Evaluation of Name and Subject Headings at the University of Arkansas Libraries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kulczak and Reineka report on the measurement of the quality of headings in Government Printing Office records supplied by Marcive and found that, while the overall quality was good, a significant percentage of headings in the authority reports required additional attention. 150 Shin reports on an assessment of 2,000 Koreanlanguage bibliographic records in WorldCat and considers specific errors, error frequency, areas where errors occur frequently, and errors that could inhibit record retrieval. 151 Shin found patterns in the errors involving ISBD punctuation, missing variable and fixed fields, and that these patterns are similar to other studies.…”
Section: Information Organization Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kulczak and Reineka report on the measurement of the quality of headings in Government Printing Office records supplied by Marcive and found that, while the overall quality was good, a significant percentage of headings in the authority reports required additional attention. 150 Shin reports on an assessment of 2,000 Koreanlanguage bibliographic records in WorldCat and considers specific errors, error frequency, areas where errors occur frequently, and errors that could inhibit record retrieval. 151 Shin found patterns in the errors involving ISBD punctuation, missing variable and fixed fields, and that these patterns are similar to other studies.…”
Section: Information Organization Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These problems included incorrect choice or form of headings that affect authority control, missing call numbers, missing or duplicate records, typographical errors, and MARC coding errors. 12 Mugridge and Edmunds described their experiences of batch loading vendor record sets to improve access to electronic and microform collections at Penn State University Libraries. 13 They noted that the process involves collaborations between various library units for purchasing, reviewing records, assessing record quality to meet local customization needs, and coordinating record loads and their ongoing maintenance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%