2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping urban resilience to disasters – A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
54
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the urban resilience perspective, the adopted definition of resilience focuses on how a city can absorb and adapt to external pressures during any crisis, hazards or disasters ( Rus, Kilar, & Koren, 2018 ; Zhu, Li, & Feng, 2019 ). Specifically, Meerow, Newell, and Stults, 2016 , page 39) define urban resilience as how an urban system can “maintain or rapidly return to desired functions in the face of a disturbance, to adapt to change, and to quickly transform systems that limit current or future adaptive capacity” ( Cariolet, Vuillet, & Diab, 2019 ).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the urban resilience perspective, the adopted definition of resilience focuses on how a city can absorb and adapt to external pressures during any crisis, hazards or disasters ( Rus, Kilar, & Koren, 2018 ; Zhu, Li, & Feng, 2019 ). Specifically, Meerow, Newell, and Stults, 2016 , page 39) define urban resilience as how an urban system can “maintain or rapidly return to desired functions in the face of a disturbance, to adapt to change, and to quickly transform systems that limit current or future adaptive capacity” ( Cariolet, Vuillet, & Diab, 2019 ).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2010, although Renschler et al proposed that GIS plays a major role in assessing system resilience, there is no clear method on how to apply it in practice [11]. Cariolet et al filled this gap and developed methodologies for mapping urban resilience to disaster [12]. This is an important step in promoting the wide-ranging application of advanced techniques in urban resilience research.…”
Section: Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When it comes to mapping the urban resilience to disasters, Cariolet et al [5] note that some researches concentrate on mapping urban adaptive resilience, which, according to Cutter's definition [37], involves measuring the impact of, and the recovery trajectory after, a disastrous event; whereas others focus on mapping the urban inherent resilience capacity, considering the characteristics that determine the ability of a system to absorb, recover from and adapt to change, using a set of resilience indices. Overall, the authors identify a lack of studies validating analytical top-down methods for mapping the ex-ante urban inherent resilience capacity, based on empirical observations of the ex-post situation.…”
Section: Resilience Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some related concepts have been transferred to multilateral risk management and urban disaster mitigation policies such as [3], urban resilience principles are yet to be fully operationalised [4]. Indeed, the plethora of existing definitions of urban and community resilience generates ambiguities (e.g., confusion between urban resilience and urban vulnerability mapping [5]) which impact on the creation, use and output interpretation of urban analysis models, simulation tools and connected Decision Support Systems (DSS). However, urban resilience-thinking [6] and novel sustainable urban planning approaches based on urban systems' performance, such as Performance-Based Planning (PBP) [7] and Adaptive Planning and Management (APM) [8], require the support of a rich toolkit of such planning instruments that is fully operational.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%