2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.03.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping the UK interbank system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
65
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
65
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Finger et al (2013) analysed the network properties of the electronic market for interbank deposits (eMID) at various temporal scales of data aggregation, showing that the network appears random at the daily level, but contains significant non-random structures for longer aggregation periods. Several empirical studies further reported that interbank markets have a core-periphery (or tiered) structure, featuring a core of highly interconnected banks and a periphery of banks connected mostly to the core but not to other peripheral banks (Bech and Atalay, 2010;Craig and Von Peter, 2014;Fricke and Lux, 2015;Iori et al, 2008;Langfield et al, 2014;Martinez-Jaramillo et al, 2014;Silva et al, 2016;Soramäki et al, 2007;Veld and van Lelyveld, 2014). Craig and Von Peter (2014) argued that tiering derives from core banks acting as intermediaries between periphery banks and thus holding together the interbank market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finger et al (2013) analysed the network properties of the electronic market for interbank deposits (eMID) at various temporal scales of data aggregation, showing that the network appears random at the daily level, but contains significant non-random structures for longer aggregation periods. Several empirical studies further reported that interbank markets have a core-periphery (or tiered) structure, featuring a core of highly interconnected banks and a periphery of banks connected mostly to the core but not to other peripheral banks (Bech and Atalay, 2010;Craig and Von Peter, 2014;Fricke and Lux, 2015;Iori et al, 2008;Langfield et al, 2014;Martinez-Jaramillo et al, 2014;Silva et al, 2016;Soramäki et al, 2007;Veld and van Lelyveld, 2014). Craig and Von Peter (2014) argued that tiering derives from core banks acting as intermediaries between periphery banks and thus holding together the interbank market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through network structures, the credit risk is the important one in the interbank system (Langfield et al, 2014), similar to with Langfield et al (2014) in the analysis of both the interbank lending and the interbank debt. My model includes a regressor for the interbank lending adjustment.…”
Section: Ho Thanh Tungmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The network has a core-periphery structure in the sense that the first five banks form a complete network where all possible lending relationships are present, and each of these core banks has further borrowed money from 19 different periphery banks. We refer to the papers Elsinger et al (2006), Cont et al (2013), Craig and von Peter (2014) and Langfield et al (2014) for empirical evidence of such structures in real banking networks. The time horizon in our example is T = 1 year, all interest rates are zero, and we assume statistical equality among all core banks and among all periphery banks:…”
Section: Computation Of Default Probabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the mainly theoretical contributions mentioned above, a lot of empirical work has been carried out, see e.g. Elsinger et al (2006), Cont et al (2013), Craig and von Peter (2014) and Langfield et al (2014) for applications to central bank data from the Austrian, Brazilian, German and UK banking system, respectively. Furthermore, apart from work based on variations of the Eisenberg and Noe (2001) model, there are also other network-based approaches to systemic risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%