2023
DOI: 10.1108/medar-09-2022-1809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping the state of expanded audit reporting: a bibliometric view

Abstract: Purpose This study aims to identify the intellectual structure of expanded audit reporting (EAR), offers a quantitative summation of prominent themes, contributors and knowledge gaps and provides suggestions for further research. Design/methodology/approach This research uses various bibliometric techniques, including co-word and co-citation analysis for EAR science mapping, based on 123 papers from Scopus Database between 1991 and 2022. Findings The results show EAR research is focused on Audit Quality; A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 150 publications
(232 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Aria and Cuccurullo (2017), bibliometric analysis uses statistical and mathematical methodologies to study trends in the literature that are still within the purview of one domain. Several previous studies have used bibliometric analysis to analyze AI topics in the accounting domain, such as studies conducted by Mashayekhi et al (2023), namely the bibliometric analysis of the blockchain in extended audit reporting (EAR), Lardo et al (2021), namely bibliometric analysis of AI in the general scope of business, management, and accounting, and Lamboglia (2020). The bibliometric analysis method was used for this study because it has the advantage of examining a discipline's development, trends, and publication patterns.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Aria and Cuccurullo (2017), bibliometric analysis uses statistical and mathematical methodologies to study trends in the literature that are still within the purview of one domain. Several previous studies have used bibliometric analysis to analyze AI topics in the accounting domain, such as studies conducted by Mashayekhi et al (2023), namely the bibliometric analysis of the blockchain in extended audit reporting (EAR), Lardo et al (2021), namely bibliometric analysis of AI in the general scope of business, management, and accounting, and Lamboglia (2020). The bibliometric analysis method was used for this study because it has the advantage of examining a discipline's development, trends, and publication patterns.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include scalability concerns, regulatory and legal uncertainties, privacy issues, technical complexities, and the need for standardized protocols and frameworks. Addressing these challenges is crucial for realizing the full potential of blockchain in enhancing audit quality [ 34 ]. As technology evolves and adoption increases, further research is needed to provide more robust evidence and insights into the implications of blockchain for audit quality [ 35 ].…”
Section: Literature Review and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of CNA and GCS analysis is useful for investigating the state of the art in a field and its development. However, to deepen the understanding of the structure of the field, to pinpoint the most recent trends and themes shared among all the contributions, and to identify potential future directions (Mashayekhi et al, 2023), a co-occurrence analysis the author keywords of the whole set of papers resulting from the SLR phase (Ding et al, 2001) is performed.…”
Section: Co-occurrence Analysis Of Authors' Abstractmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, 'audit committee' in Cluster 4 is an emerging topic (cf. Mashayekhi et al, 2023). Researchers, indeed, started focusing on subcommittees and their composition given their relevance in several corporate processes (Bravo & Alcaide-Ruiz, 2019).…”
Section: Co-occurrence Analysis Of Authors' Abstractmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation