2017
DOI: 10.1080/19475705.2017.1305993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping surface motion parameters and liquefaction susceptibility in Tribhuvan International Airport, Nepal

Abstract: Local site effects and liquefaction are major causes of building and lifeline damage in Kathmandu Valley as depicted by several historical earthquakes including recent 2015 Gorkha earthquake (M w 7.8). Critical facilities like airports play important role in post-earthquake relief, response and recovery efforts. Tribhuvan International Airport (TIA) is the only international airport in Nepal that is located in alluvial soil deposit regarded as Gokarna formation. To assess the site effects and liquefaction occu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite several studies consider liquefaction susceptibility analysis of Kathmandu Valley, virtually all such studies are confined to deterministic approach (e.g., Gautam, de Magistris, and Fabbrocino 2017;Gautam, 2017b). Furthermore, to the best of authors' knowledge, none of the previous studies focused on the input ground acceleration considering the pertinent seismic hazard scenario.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite several studies consider liquefaction susceptibility analysis of Kathmandu Valley, virtually all such studies are confined to deterministic approach (e.g., Gautam, de Magistris, and Fabbrocino 2017;Gautam, 2017b). Furthermore, to the best of authors' knowledge, none of the previous studies focused on the input ground acceleration considering the pertinent seismic hazard scenario.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a widely used method by researchers for various applications in order to capture local ground effects or site conditions that can affect the estimate of ground motion characteristics (Chavez-Garcia et al, 1990;Lopez-Caballero et al, 2012;Gautam and Chamlagain, 2016;Sil and Haloi, 2018). The outcomes of such studies aim to provide local seismic (Gautam, 2017) hazard parameters which can be adopted for the design of structures and infrastructures (Douglas, 2006). Ground response parameters typically characterize the complex nature of strong motion accelerograms using a simple expansion of predictive relationships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, many researchers considered multi-hazard zonation in several countries considering local boundaries (Bell and Glade 2004;Thierry et al 2008;Kappes et al 2012;Siddique and Schwarz 2015;Zhou et al 2015;Barua et al 2016;Forte et al 2019). Although multi-hazard risk assessment and hazard mapping are gaining attention in recent years, the major focus is still given for a single natural hazard so far (Fuchs et al 2009;Cao et al 2016;Gautam and Chamlagain 2016;Licata et al 2016;Santolo et al 2016;Gautam 2017b;Santo et al 2017;Sajan et al 2020). Despite probabilistic and deterministic assessment of individual hazard, historical event data are also used abundantly to create zonation maps (B€ uchele et al 2006;Abella et al 2007;Fuchs et al 2009;Meyer et al 2009;Gautam 2017a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%