2018
DOI: 10.1037/neu0000414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping self-face recognition strategies in congenital prosopagnosia.

Abstract: Our data suggest that the self-face advantage emerges both in implicit and explicit recognition tasks in CPs as much as in good recognizers, and it is not linked to any specific visual exploration strategies. (PsycINFO Database Record

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(147 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, higher thresholds in prosopagnosic participants could also reflect their need to acquire more information to make facial judgments than controls. This could account for the fact that prosopagnosic participants spend more time and make more fixations when judging the identity of a face (Malaspina, Albonico, Lao, Caldara, & Daini, 2018;Malaspina, Albonico, Toneatto, & Daini, 2017;Schmalzl, Palermo, Green, Brunsdon, & Coltheart, 2008;Schwarzer et al, 2007). Their greater starting point evidence (A) may support this second possibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, higher thresholds in prosopagnosic participants could also reflect their need to acquire more information to make facial judgments than controls. This could account for the fact that prosopagnosic participants spend more time and make more fixations when judging the identity of a face (Malaspina, Albonico, Lao, Caldara, & Daini, 2018;Malaspina, Albonico, Toneatto, & Daini, 2017;Schmalzl, Palermo, Green, Brunsdon, & Coltheart, 2008;Schwarzer et al, 2007). Their greater starting point evidence (A) may support this second possibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This pattern was not only found for the self-face but also for other familiar faces, thus indicating that familiarity might play another important role (Devue et al., 2009). When investigating differences in face-scanning strategies between unfamiliar faces and the self-face, no differences were obtained although a self-face advantage both in healthy and prosopagnosia subjects was shown (Malaspina et al., 2018). Subjects had to decide whether a chimeric face represented their own face or another unfamiliar face.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, an advantage of one's face has been observed in face processing (i.e., self-face advantage; Sugiura et al, 2005;Ma and Han, 2010). This effect has been documented even in participants with difficulties recognizing faces, namely congenital prosopagnosics (Malaspina et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%