Mapping Research in Landscape Architecture: Balancing Supply of Academic Knowledge and Demand of Professional Practice

Abstract

With increasing academic research in the past few decades, the knowledge scope of landscape architecture has expanded from traditional focus on aesthetics to a broad range of ecological, cultural and psychological issues. In order to understand how academic research and knowledge expansion may have redefined the practice, two surveys were conducted: one on Council of Educators in Landscape Architecture (CELA) in 2010 (n=230, response rate=43%), and another on the members of American Society of Landscape Architect (ASLA) in 2012 (n=239, sample rate=5%, response rate=31%). Results revealed that the scope of knowledge has expanded since 1970s in areas such as public welfare and personal pleasure. 2) The need for academic research is widely perceived in landscape architecture profession. 3) Academic research primarily generate explanatory knowledge, which has become an important supplement to judgmental design knowledge learned through systematic professional education and construction design knowledge learned through practice. 4) Practitioners believed that they use more logic thinking than intuition in their practice today, and expected more research to facilitate the former than the later.

Landscape performance evaluation in socio-ecological practice: current status and prospects

“…A survey of the American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA) members showed that 95% of the professionals believe that research is an essential way to improve practice (Chen et al 2017, p. 3669). At the same time, professionals are concerned with the possible disconnection between research produced in academia and research needs in practice (Chen et al 2017;Milburn and Brown 2016). A key way to bridge this gap is to collaboratively identify research questions and co-generate findings that are useful and impactful.…”

Higher Education Development and Regional Differences in China

“…With the advent of knowledge economy era, building an innovative country and enhancing national competitiveness become China's important strategic decisions in the context of adjustment of industrial structure and transformation of economic development pattern (Fang,2012;Ding,2015;Chen et al, 2017;Ekici et al, 2017;. To build an innovative country, science and technology are the key, qualified personnel are the core, and education is the foundation.…”