Remote Sensing of Clouds and the Atmosphere XXIV 2019
DOI: 10.1117/12.2532509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping of vegetation cover using Sentinel-2 to estimate forest fire danger

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, significant efforts have been made to develop methods for forest fire danger monitoring, prediction and assessment, for example, in the Baikal basin [66][67][68]. Currently, a project is being implemented to develop methods for monitoring forest fire dangers caused by transport infrastructure, namely, railways.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, significant efforts have been made to develop methods for forest fire danger monitoring, prediction and assessment, for example, in the Baikal basin [66][67][68]. Currently, a project is being implemented to develop methods for monitoring forest fire dangers caused by transport infrastructure, namely, railways.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some sensors widely used for this purpose include the Landsat TM, ETM and OLI (He et al 2019;Stefanidou et al 2018;Van Wagtendonk and Root 2003), the Terra and Aqua MODIS (Bajocco et al 2015;Lanorte and Lasaponara 2008), the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER, Yamaguchi et al 1998) on board Terra (Lasaponara and Lanorte 2007), and even AVHRR (Nadeau et al 2005). More recently, Sentinel-2 data have also been used for forest characterization and fuel mapping (Franke et al 2018;Hościło and Lewandowska 2019;Yankovich et al 2019). High-resolution sensors, such as QuickBird, have also been used for fuel type classification in small areas (Arroyo et al 2006).…”
Section: Fuel Types Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the majority of existing studies consider texture features as implicit features for algorithm learning and training, with only a minority of studies incorporating texture features in the explicit construction of detection indices [30,31]. To differentiate between burned and unburned areas, local adaptive algorithms such as the Support Vector Machines (SVM) [32], Maximum Likelihood (ML) [33], and Random Forest (RF) [34] algorithms have been widely employed in mapping burnt areas. These algorithms operate by maximizing interclass variation and minimizing intraclass variation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%