2022
DOI: 10.1002/saj2.20371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping of soil organic carbon using machine learning models: Combination of optical and radar remote sensing data

Abstract: Soil organic C (SOC) plays an important role in soil quality. Thus, it is of great significance to know the spatial distribution characteristics of SOC. Environmental variables, such as natural predictors, remote sensing (RS) variables, and digital soil mapping approaches have been widely used in SOC prediction. However, it is still challenging to determine which methods and variables are effective to map SOC in farmland. In this study, we compare the performance of three machine learning models, including ran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
(202 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One study shows that including SAR data at longer wavelengths such as L-band helps distinguish different peatland classes from non-peatlands, but with less importance than Cband [25]. The different studies also report different conclusions on the relative importance of optical remote sensing versus SAR data for regional SOC characterization [25]- [27], which likely depends on the regional differences in topography, vegetation and surface wetness conditions represented from the various studies. The strong sensitivity of radar backscatter to multiple factors including land cover, surface snow and moisture changes affected by heterogeneous freeze/thaw and precipitation events may add additional challenges for regional mapping.…”
Section: B Regional Soc Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study shows that including SAR data at longer wavelengths such as L-band helps distinguish different peatland classes from non-peatlands, but with less importance than Cband [25]. The different studies also report different conclusions on the relative importance of optical remote sensing versus SAR data for regional SOC characterization [25]- [27], which likely depends on the regional differences in topography, vegetation and surface wetness conditions represented from the various studies. The strong sensitivity of radar backscatter to multiple factors including land cover, surface snow and moisture changes affected by heterogeneous freeze/thaw and precipitation events may add additional challenges for regional mapping.…”
Section: B Regional Soc Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When combined, remote sensing data enriches machine learning models with comprehensive environmental information, enabling precise analysis and prediction [17]. The multiple, spatially extensive spectral data from remote sensing serve as input to the machine learning models, leading to model the complex relationships for SOC estimations [24]. This approach can reduce the cost of measuring SOC by reducing the number of sampling profiles required for estimation of SOC, therefore providing a more cost-effective and scalable solution for large-scale SOC mapping [17,18,51,54].…”
Section: Integration Of Remote Sensing and Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integration of techniques aims to overcome the limitations of traditional methods and provide cost-effective, accurate, and scalable solutions for SOC measurement [24,25]. Remote sensing allows for the collection of large-scale, spatially explicit data on soil properties, including SOC, by utilizing various sensors mounted on satellites or aircraft [20,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning models can effectively avoid this evaluation uncertainty caused by empirical knowledge and subjective judgement, and by learning from soil data, assessment models can be built more quickly and accurately. Zhou et al [14] used a combination of optical and radar remote sensing data to apply the SVM algorithm to build a Soil organic C (SOC) prediction model; Zou et al [15] collected historical soil data from southern China and combined multivariate linear model (MLM) and mixed effects regression model (MEM) for soil productivity assessment; Shehu et al [16] obtained 1781 sets of maize farmland data comparison in Northern Nigeria using linear regression models, as well as random forest machine learning to predict maize yields based on nutrient concentrations in spike leaves; Pan Y et al [17] provided an estimate of land productivity in the conterminous United States of America (CONUS) through machine learning algorithms using a data-driven approach to incorporate relationships from the data into the land productivity evaluation. However, challenges remain in terms of applicability and interpretability of machine learning models [18], including the requirement of datasets (e.g., combining large remote sensing datasets and larger historical datasets) and due to the black box nature of machine learning resulting in little insight into agricultural management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%