2012
DOI: 10.1080/17445647.2012.668414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping of avalanche start zones susceptibility: Arazas basin, Ordesa and Monte Perdido National Park (Spanish Pyrenees)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The algorithm of Maggioni et al (2002) was also tested but only produces meaningful results with DEM resolutions on the order of 25 m. Furthermore, this algorithm was written in ARC Macro Language and is difficult to run with the current software. The other algorithms by Ghinoi and Chung (2005), Barbolini et al (2011), Andres and Chueca Cia (2012), Pistocchi and Notarnicola (2013), and Chueca Cia et al (2014 have been developed by other research groups and were not available for comparison. For a meaningful comparison and validation of the three selected algorithms, a good reference data set is mandatory.…”
Section: Existing Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm of Maggioni et al (2002) was also tested but only produces meaningful results with DEM resolutions on the order of 25 m. Furthermore, this algorithm was written in ARC Macro Language and is difficult to run with the current software. The other algorithms by Ghinoi and Chung (2005), Barbolini et al (2011), Andres and Chueca Cia (2012), Pistocchi and Notarnicola (2013), and Chueca Cia et al (2014 have been developed by other research groups and were not available for comparison. For a meaningful comparison and validation of the three selected algorithms, a good reference data set is mandatory.…”
Section: Existing Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early versions of GIS based avalanche terrain models (Ghinoi and Chung, 2005;Gruber and Haefner, 1995;Maggioni and Gruber, 2003) struggled to outperform simple slope based avalanche release area estimates (Voellmy, 1955) due to the inability of low resolution DEM (20-30 m) to detect small scale terrain features. Current PRA modelling methods evolved over the course of a decade and benefit from developments in high-resolution DEM production and remote sensing (Andres and Chueca Cía, 2012;Barbolini et al, 2011;Bühler et al, 2013Chueca Cía et al, 2014;Pistocchi and Notarnicola, 2013;Veitinger et al, 2016;Kumar et al, 2016Kumar et al, , 2019. Bühler et al (2013) found that 5 m DEM resolution is the optimal tradeoff between processing efficiency and small-scale feature identification for PRA modelling.…”
Section: Potential Avalanche Release Area Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Terrain parameters DTM resolution Classification approach Andres and Cía (2012) slope, plan curvature 5 m (from 1 : 25 000 m map) binary Barbolini et al (2011) slope, plan curvature 10 m binary Bühler et al (2012) slope, plan curvature, roughness 5 m binary Cia et al (2014) slope, plan curvature 5 m (from 1 : 25 000 m map) binary Ghinoi and Chung (2005) slope, aspect, elevation, curvature, 20 m continuous distance to ridge Gruber and Sardemann (2003) slope, plan curvature, distance to ridge 25, 50 m for curvature binary Maggioni and Gruber (2003) slope, aspect, plan curvature, distance to ridge 25, 50 m for curvature binary Pistocchi and Notarnicola (2013) slope, aspect, elevation, profile curvature, 10 m continuous distance to ridge, topographic wetness index or the elevation of isotherms (Cia et al, 2014), or they introduce a qualitative roughness measure derived from aerial photographs (Ghinoi and Chung, 2005). An overview of the existing approaches and their corresponding terrain parameters is shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%