2014
DOI: 10.4236/jwarp.2014.68072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping Mountain Front Recharge Areas in Arid Watersheds Based on a Digital Elevation Model and Land Cover Types

Abstract: A recent assessment that quantified potential impacts of solar energy development on water resources in the southwestern United States necessitated the development of a methodology to identify locations of mountain front recharge (MFR) in order to guide land development decisions. A spatially explicit, slope-based algorithm was created to delineate MFR zones in 17 arid, mountainous watersheds using elevation and land cover data. Slopes were calculated from elevation data and grouped into 100 classes using iter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several point-scale recharge estimation methods that rely on direct measurements at a specific location (i.e., a groundwater well) over time have been used to document MBGR. These include, e.g., assessments of groundwater table fluctuations (Healy and Cook, 2002); ionic mass balances for approximating gross inputs and outputs of water (Wilson and Guan, 2004;Aishlin and McNamara, 2011); and using isotope and noble gas geochemistry to estimate groundwater ages and recharge sources Solomon, 2003, 2005;Anderson et al, 2005;Ma et al, 2009;Bowen et al, 2014;Markovich et al, 2021). While these approaches have shown to be useful in documenting MBGR, they have been of limited use for the quantification of MBGR rates due to the difficulty of obtaining sufficient data for a watershed-wide analysis.…”
Section: Introduction Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several point-scale recharge estimation methods that rely on direct measurements at a specific location (i.e., a groundwater well) over time have been used to document MBGR. These include, e.g., assessments of groundwater table fluctuations (Healy and Cook, 2002); ionic mass balances for approximating gross inputs and outputs of water (Wilson and Guan, 2004;Aishlin and McNamara, 2011); and using isotope and noble gas geochemistry to estimate groundwater ages and recharge sources Solomon, 2003, 2005;Anderson et al, 2005;Ma et al, 2009;Bowen et al, 2014;Markovich et al, 2021). While these approaches have shown to be useful in documenting MBGR, they have been of limited use for the quantification of MBGR rates due to the difficulty of obtaining sufficient data for a watershed-wide analysis.…”
Section: Introduction Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%